Did you try out test.generative? If so, how does simple check contrast to test.generative?
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:31:19 AM UTC-8, Chas Emerick wrote: > > simple-check is planning on remaining Clojure-only, at least for the > foreseeable future. This "non-fork fork" is the best alternative Reid > and I could come up with to enable people to use it on both Clojure and > ClojureScript. Hopefully double-check will be unnecessary at some > point. :-) > > - Chas > > On Thu 21 Nov 2013 02:01:02 PM EST, Max Penet wrote: > > Looks good! > > > > I am wondering though, why not merging your work on the parent project > > instead of creating a new one (with a new name etc), you seemed to be > > on your way of doing just this? > > > > On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:38:16 PM UTC+1, Chas Emerick wrote: > > > > Reid Draper's simple-check[1] is a generative/property-based testing > > library for Clojure that implements (and improves upon IMO) the > > shrinking of failing test cases seen in e.g. quickcheck in the > > Haskell > > and Erlang lands. > > > > simple-check has totally changed how I do certain kinds of > > testing. From > > the beginning, I've wanted to use it when testing ClojureScript > > libraries and apps as well, since most of my ClojureScript code is > > portable to Clojure, or made that way with cljx[2]. > > > > The result is double-check, a fork of simple-check that provides the > > same API and generator semantics for Clojure and ClojureScript: > > > > > > https://github.com/cemerick/double-check<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw> > > > > < > https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fdouble-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGMdmXeOnf3w2MMaq09pIO9XEqONw>> > > > > > > > > double-check will fast-follow the development of simple-check, > > aiming to > > provide nothing more than a portable API; there should never be > > anything > > novel or interesting in double-check, except for the recasting of > the > > simple-check codebase into a portable form. > > > > Naturally, double-check adds support/integration for > > clojurescript.test[3] where simple-check supports/integrates > > clojure.test. > > > > I've discovered (and reported and/or fixed) a number of issues in > > ClojureScript itself solely by making simple-check's own tests > > portable, > > and running them on ClojureScript. I suspect you'll have the same > > experience with your own Clojure/ClojureScript projects once you > > apply > > double-check to them. > > > > Cheers, > > > > - Chas > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-check<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw> > > > > < > https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Freiddraper%2Fsimple-check&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNENCgO1ktV_VfKH71w4oza6yEE0xw>> > > > > > > [2] > > https://github.com/lynaghk/cljx<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljx&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ> > > > > < > https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljx&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flynaghk%2Fcljx&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNErrEPQTKkQAd-ma4oaCPVdW8BUJQ>> > > > > > > [3] > > https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.test<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.test&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg> > > > > < > https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.test&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcemerick%2Fclojurescript.test&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGiV-NGOk4wuDpgDkZolznHF5c1Dg>> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > > with your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
