Yes, docstrings/etc are hard work- Certainly sensible to focus on the core
design issues.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:59:48 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
> People should implement sugar if they feel so inclined. Om is not mature
> enough that I want to spend time supporting extra stuff when th
People should implement sugar if they feel so inclined. Om is not mature
enough that I want to spend time supporting extra stuff when the library is
evolving so rapidly. Keeping docstrings and tutorials in sync and fielding
questions is keeping me plenty busy :)
David
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:4
Is it wrong to wish "component" worked like this?
(component (render []
(div nil "Hello There!")))
(component (render-state [state]
(div nil "Hello There!"))
(component (will-mount [_]
(js/console.log "mounting!"))L
(render [
Well at least I can know guess at the etymology : sql join leaps to mind,
joining on a different "branch" of the state tree with keys from another branch.
I didn't understand that until I read your tutorial.
On Monday, January 27, 2014 10:35:54 AM UTC-8, David Nolen wrote:
> om/join is conceptu
Hi David
I managed to fix it by:
1. Changing project.clj to use om 0.3.0
2. lein cljsbuild clean
Thanks a lot for following up ;-)
I am enjoying working in Om/React with ClojureScript ;-)
On 28/01/2014, at 5:23 AM, David Pidcock wrote:
> Did you get this fixed Rudi?
> If your project file r
om/join is conceptually quite cool, but it actually needs some serious work
as alluded - currently you're likely to run into some nasty surprises if
you really try to use it. The tutorials aren't going to proceed until this
is addressed sometime this week.
David
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:28 PM,
looking forward to working through the new stuff later this week.
On Jan 26, 2014, at 10:19 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> Glad to hear it. I recommend taking a look at the new section "Higher Order
> Components"
> http://github.com/swannodette/om/wiki/Tutorial#wiki-higher-order-components,
> we're
I'm a big fan of this new tutorial.
It hi-lights some of the benefits of cursors, and I actually realize how I
might use om/join suddenly :D
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Mike Haney wrote:
> I was initially surprised by the implementation in your tutorial using
> multimethods instead of protocols, especially since you are only
> dispatching on a single function. But as I thought about it more, I
> realized this could be a perfect
Did you get this fixed Rudi?
If your project file requires om 0.2.3, then it was something with the
lein new command (which is now fixed).
I recommend manually changing the project file to require om 0.3.0 and then
don't forget to "lein cljscript clean" before recompiling (which I did).
O
Thank you for this David. It's really amazing.
On Monday, January 27, 2014 1:19:03 AM UTC-2, David Nolen wrote:
> Glad to hear it. I recommend taking a look at the new section "Higher Order
> Components"
> http://github.com/swannodette/om/wiki/Tutorial#wiki-higher-order-components,
> we're fina
Glad to hear it. I recommend taking a look at the new section "Higher Order
Components"
http://github.com/swannodette/om/wiki/Tutorial#wiki-higher-order-components,
we're finally getting to the "good stuff" IMO :)
David
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Jamie Orchard-Hays wrote:
> :) Worked thro
Hi wuqi...@gmail.com,
You can just open the file. I got some blank pages when for some reason I
wasn't able to reach fb.me. Check your Network tab in the developer tools.
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 6:12:52 AM UTC-2, wuqi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 8:16:15 AM UTC+8, Davi
This fixed it for me. Thanks !
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 7:13:43 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> The tutorial doesn't cover using advanced optimizations and it doesn't
> appear your index.html page is setup for it. I switched your project to use
> :optimizations :none. I ran `lein cljsbuild
The tutorial doesn't cover using advanced optimizations and it doesn't
appear your index.html page is setup for it. I switched your project to use
:optimizations :none. I ran `lein cljsbuild clean` to blow everything away.
I ran CIDER and followed your instructions. At that point everything works
f
The one on master is using 0.2.3. Checkout the 0.3.0 branch for the same
results.
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:17:32 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> That project.clj is using Om 0.2.3 and not Om 0.3.0.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:16 PM, john walker
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Woops, left it off:
Woops, left it off:
https://github.com/johnwalker/hellom
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:15:59 PM UTC-5, john walker wrote:
>
> This is what I did (using the om-start template.)
>
> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 5:51:06 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>>
>> I cannot replicate this. If somebody wants
That project.clj is using Om 0.2.3 and not Om 0.3.0.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:16 PM, john walker wrote:
> Woops, left it off:
>
> https://github.com/johnwalker/hellom
>
>
> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:15:59 PM UTC-5, john walker wrote:
>>
>> This is what I did (using the om-start template.)
This is what I did (using the om-start template.)
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 5:51:06 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> I cannot replicate this. If somebody wants to publish a repo that exhibits
> the problem I'll take a look. Thanks.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Rudi Engelbrecht
>
>
I cannot replicate this. If somebody wants to publish a repo that exhibits
the problem I'll take a look. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Rudi Engelbrecht wrote:
> I experienced the same as you when following the tutorial - it works the
> first time and when adding the deref the delete b
I experienced the same as you when following the tutorial - it works the first
time and when adding the deref the delete button stops working
Rudi
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 6:51 AM, David Pidcock wrote:
>
>
> I was following along with this and hit an interesting "bug"
>
>
> The contact list
Hi David
Thank you for a great tutorial!
I really enjoyed working through your Tutorial on LightTable and Om.
A note: In my environment the contact is being deleted when the contact-view
has the following code
(defn contact-view [contact owner] (reifyom/IRenderState(render-state
[
I'm getting the deref error, but the first example failed as expected in
0.3.0.
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 2:51:08 PM UTC-5, David Pidcock wrote:
>
> I was following along with this and hit an interesting "bug"
>
> The contact list delete button actually works "out of the gate" in the
> firs
I was following along with this and hit an interesting "bug"
The contact list delete button actually works "out of the gate" in the first
example, (when its supposed to fail) and when I add the deref in the next step
I get
Uncaught Error: No protocol method IDeref.-deref defined for type
om.c
A few minor simplifications to the Om model in this release. A breaking
change if you were using om.core/bind, om.core/pure-bind or om.core/read -
these complications have been removed.
There's also now a tutorial optimized for Light Table for people want to
understand the Om approach to React wit
25 matches
Mail list logo
