Been running with this in production for two days now. Working fine.
onsdag 16. desember 2015 22.45.21 UTC+1 skrev Alex Miller følgende:
>
> Clojure 1.8.0-RC4 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We
> would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your own libraries or
>
This release candidate appears to be working fine for me, as have the
previous ones.
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 3:45:21 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Clojure 1.8.0-RC4 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We
> would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your
Apologies for the incoming wall of text, as well as for co-opting the -RC4
thread
TLDR:
-RC4 LGTM, I enjoy the startup-speed boost
- we need a benchmark before further evaluating the work on tuples
2015-12-18 13:02 GMT+01:00 Mikera :
>
> I don't actually recall seeing any benchmarks showing slow
I haven't talked to Rich about it recently, but I expect tuples will be
reassessed at some point. I don't think more patches would be helpful at
this time.
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 6:08:39 AM UTC-6, Mikera wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 17 December 2015 04:34:58 UTC, Alex Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 04:34:58 UTC, Alex Miller wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Mikera > wrote:
>
>>
>> What's the plan with Tuples more broadly?
>>
>
> Don't know.
>
>
I'm willing to take another shot at at a patch for this, as I believe there
is a decent performance win s
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 14:59:37 UTC, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
>
> Am 17.12.2015 02:35 schrieb "Mikera"
> >:
>
> > What's the plan with Tuples more broadly?
>
> Speaking as a kibitzer to the process: Suppose somebody was to carry this
> along, I'd like to see these points addressed:
>
> II
Am 17.12.2015 02:35 schrieb "Mikera" :
> What's the plan with Tuples more broadly?
Speaking as a kibitzer to the process: Suppose somebody was to carry this
along, I'd like to see these points addressed:
IIRC, the breaking factor to the proposal were slow-downs in real-world
programs, likely due
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Mikera
wrote:
>
> What's the plan with Tuples more broadly?
>
Don't know.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new member
Thanks Alex, working well for me and startup times certainly seem a bit
snappier.
I also agree that APersistentVector should not implement IMapEntry.
always seemed like a bad idea to so glad to see it rolled back.
What's the plan with Tuples more broadly? I worked on this many months ago
a
Clojure 1.8.0-RC4 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We
would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your own libraries or
internal projects to find problems.
Of particular note, CLJ-1861 removes the interning of unused vars. This
change reduces compiled class size
10 matches
Mail list logo
