I haven't talked to Rich about it recently, but I expect tuples will be reassessed at some point. I don't think more patches would be helpful at this time.
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 6:08:39 AM UTC-6, Mikera wrote: > > On Thursday, 17 December 2015 04:34:58 UTC, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Mikera <mike.r.an...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> What's the plan with Tuples more broadly? >>> >> >> Don't know. >> >> > I'm willing to take another shot at at a patch for this, as I believe > there is a decent performance win still on the table. > > But I need some guidance first from the core team on: > a) What "real world" benchmark(s) would be required to demonstrate an > overall improvement? > b) If I can demonstrate an overall improvement on said benchmark(s), will > the patch be accepted (otherwise I'm wasting my time)? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
