On Mar 10, 10:03 am, Vincent Foley wrote:
> With Clojure you don't need to understand Monads. And I don't think
> they're hard to understand, I think they're hard to come to grips with
> because of what they are capable of.
>
> Anyway, I hope you enjoy Clojure :)
Yes, I know, but I'd like to
Thanks everyone! That gives me a lot more confidence in trying
Clojure. There is a certain freedom in not worrying about types. I
spend a lot of time in Java trying to get types and type hierarchies
right (especially generics). I haven't been doing a lot of unit
testing but I can see how that woul
Hey everyone. I've been keeping up with developments in Clojure for a
few months now and have a question for all you long-time static typers
out there (I know you're there :)
I really like what I read about Clojure and LISP in general and can
see the potential for great power and flexibility. I k
On Feb 25, 6:02 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" wrote:
>
> - When using waterfront on Mac OS X, it appears that the control
> characters intended to trigger menu selections (e.g. ^E) are being
> intercepted before they reach the menus. In the specific case of ^E,
> it is being interpreted by the t
