Re: Static type guy trying to convert

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:34:27 -0700 


On Mar 10, 10:03 am, Vincent Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
> With Clojure you don't need to understand Monads.  And I don't think
> they're hard to understand, I think they're hard to come to grips with
> because of what they are capable of.
>
> Anyway, I hope you enjoy Clojure :)

Yes, I know, but I'd like to understand them anyway. Looks like a good
way to avoid mutable state in my programs (along with other things).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---























					Reply via email to