Hi Brian,
On Friday, 25 January 2019 22:19:21 UTC, Brian Craft wrote:
>
> Are there any docs on transducer parallelism?
>
Not a lot, but you can find something here:
https://labs.uswitch.com/transducers-from-the-ground-up-the-practice/#parallelism
I had the impression, from various sources, tha
I'm doing a little research for a talk and asking clojurists around. The
thesis I'm supporting is that transducers should completely replace
"normal" (non-reducing based) sequential processing. People have different
reactions to this, usually going from "what's wrong with threading macros"
to "
Hi,
thanks for the clarification. Not sure #3 is worth a Jira either, is
perhaps useful for a few and there are more important things I guess. #2 is
a work in progress already and #1 it's by design. I'm just happy it is
noted somewhere such as here and clojuredocs (done).
Thanks
Renzo
On Mond
On Monday, 29 May 2017 18:45:20 UTC+1, Nicola Mometto wrote:
>
> Issue #1 had been logged in CLJ-1242, but it was later decided to just
> focus on making equality not throw as contains/get throwing is consistent
> with java behaviour, see comments from Stu and Alex here
> https://dev.clojure.o
I was wondering if the following 'get' behaviors are worth a chat.
Apologies if this is known issue, but they don't seem impossible corner
cases to me.
#1
This one looks read-only access to me and I'm not sure why a suitable
comparator should be in place.
(get (sorted-map :a 1 :b 2) "a" "not
Yep, I mentioned the Almanac to "senior stakeholders" while pitching the
book :)
It was a less internet-based age, but I think there is still room for an
offline reference.
Thanks
Renzo
On Thursday, 8 December 2016 07:05:07 UTC, Torsten Uhlmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Back i
Thanks Ryan, added this (and Alex's) to the book issues tracker. Will land
in the following releases.
On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 23:43:28 UTC, Ryan Fowler wrote:
>
> I love the idea.
>
> A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail
> about `case` to consider mention
Hey Alex, many good points and great feedback. More inline.
On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:57:07 UTC, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>
> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come out)
> but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me
Not sure it's worth to depend on a library for a defprotocol with two
functions. Also, still need to double check, but I think I can get rid of
that defprotocol.
Renzo
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:12:42 UTC+1, James Reeves wrote:
>
> Why implement your own Lifecycle protocol, rather than using t
Hello,
the following stops executing on 1.8.0-rc1 or current master-head
(9448d627e091bc010e68e05a5669c134cd715a98, 1.8-RC1 plus Rich fix
for CLJ-1846):
[/Users/reborg]$ repl
Clojure 1.8.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user=> (defn ^double timespi [^double x] (* x 3.14))
#'user/timespi
user=> (timespi 2)
Abs
10 matches
Mail list logo
