I'm doing a little research for a talk and asking clojurists around. The thesis I'm supporting is that transducers should completely replace "normal" (non-reducing based) sequential processing. People have different reactions to this, usually going from "what's wrong with threading macros" to "I only use them for performances" to "they are less readable". I think it's mostly habit.
Personally, I can't find any good reason not to ditch Clojure <1.7 sequential processing and use transducers exclusively. It took me a couple of years to kill my habit but hey, they came late. If 1.0 shipped with transducers and 1.7 introduced thread macros to create data pipelines, people would probably go now: "why should I use a macro instead of comp", "they are slow", "they don't compose easily" etc. What do you think? Am I missing something? Renzo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
