, I suppose. The tests I've written don't cover all the
expected behavior of try/catch/finally.
Joe
On Aug 10, 12:23 pm, joegg wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> Looking through the output of javap -v, it looks to me like this is
> roughly what's been emitted (please forgive t
Laurent,
Looking through the output of javap -v, it looks to me like this is
roughly what's been emitted (please forgive the mix of clojure and
java):
try {
(prn :test)
(swap! a inc)
(.foo nil)
} finally {
(swap! a inc)
(.foo nil)
}
Which explains why @a is 3 -- I'm not sure this is in
I agree with Laurent's idea that you should pull this out as a
separate function, but I think the most direct answer to your question
is that you can bind the map entries in a destructuring as if they
were two-element vectors.
(map (fn [[ingr quant]] (* (cost ingr) quant)) (cookbook drink))
Joe
We're having a meetup for Pittsburgh-area Clojure programmers. The
first meeting is Wednesday March 10th at 7pm at The Library (on Carson
Street). The plan for now is to have shorter talks and presentations,
followed by general discussion and possibly some (hopefully fun!)
coding. We welcome any
