I agree with Laurent's idea that you should pull this out as a
separate function, but I think the most direct answer to your question
is that you can bind the map entries in a destructuring  as if they
were two-element vectors.

(map (fn [[ingr quant]] (* (cost ingr) quant)) (cookbook drink))

Joe

On Jul 28, 8:02 pm, Daniel Glauser <danglau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm working on some sample code and I have a feeling that there is an
> easier/more succinct way to code this.  Any help or RTFM with a link
> is appreciated.
>
> Given:
>
> (def cookbook {:Coffee          {:coffee 3, :sugar 1, :cream 1},
>                :Decaf-Coffee    {:decaf 3, :sugar 1, :cream 1},
>                :Caffe-Late      {:espresso 2, :steamed-milk 1},
>                :Caffe-Americano {:espresso 3},
>                :Caffe-Moca      {:espresso 1, :coco 1, :steamed-milk
> 1, :cream 1},
>                :Cappuccino      {:espresso 2, :steamed-milk 1, :foamed-milk
> 1} })
>
> (def cost {:coffee        0.75,
>            :decaf         0.75,
>            :sugar         0.25,
>            :cream         0.25,
>            :steamed-milk  0.35,
>            :foamed-milk   0.35,
>            :espresso      1.00,
>            :cocoa         0.90,
>            :whipped-cream 1.00 })
>
> (def menu {:Coffee          1,
>            :Decaf-Coffee    2,
>            :Caffe-Late      3,
>            :Caffe-Americano 4,
>            :Caffe-Moca      5,
>            :Cappuccino      6 })
>
> I'm trying to write a function to print out the menu listing the cost
> of each drink.  It works (sort of) but I keep thinking there is an
> easier way.
>
> (defn print-menu [menu]
>   (do
>     (println "Menu:")
>     (doseq [[drink number] menu]
>       (println (str number ", " (drink-name drink) ", "
>                     (reduce +
>                             (map (fn [map-entry] (* (cost (key map-entry) 
> (val map-
> entry)))) (cookbook drink))))))))
>
> Specifically this part:
> (map (fn [map-entry] (* (cost (key map-entry) (val map-entry))))
> (cookbook drink))
>
> Is there a way I can get at the map key and value using destructuring
> without knowing what the key is ahead of time?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to