oops, sorry, that's not what u meant
On 3 Jun 2009, at 17:56, craig mcmillan wrote:
> user=> (seq? (seq [1]))
> true
>
> On 3 Jun 2009, at 17:53, CuppoJava wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> Is there a function that will return true iff calling seq on it's
>
user=> (seq? (seq [1]))
true
On 3 Jun 2009, at 17:53, CuppoJava wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is there a function that will return true iff calling seq on it's
> argument will not throw an error? I thought it was seq?, but (seq? [1
> 2 3]) returns false.
>
> -Patrick
> >
--~--~-~--~~--
