oops, sorry, that's not what u meant On 3 Jun 2009, at 17:56, craig mcmillan wrote:
> user=> (seq? (seq [1])) > true > > On 3 Jun 2009, at 17:53, CuppoJava wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> Is there a function that will return true iff calling seq on it's >> argument will not throw an error? I thought it was seq?, but (seq? [1 >> 2 3]) returns false. >> >> -Patrick >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
