Most notably, reify does not "def" anything. It's very in-tune with
functional programming in that way, as it has no side-effects, whereas
defrecord adds a class to the namespace.
reify has been compared to Java's anonymous classes. A good example
of its use might be in implementing a factory me
Regarding JavaBeans and the like, more often than not I've found that
when getters and setters do not reference fields directly, they are
contributing to a composition: as an adapter, a facade, or whatever-
you-please. It is not quite as often that getters simply return a
calculation based on data
he columns, I suggest keeping the
> following code handy:
>
> (defn stringify [m]
> (into {} (map (fn [k v] [(name k) v])))
>
> The simply call map
>
> (map stringify results)
>
> Sean
>
> On Dec 1, 10:01 am, Ryan Twitchell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
I'm not too happy with how resultset-seq down-cases column names and
turns them into keywords, as I would prefer to work with string keys
in some cases. I came up with the following change to give the caller
a choice to remap column keys in any way. This leaves resultset-seq's
behavior f
Hi all,
I noticed (with a very recent git pull) the following asymmetric
behavior regarding = and records:
(defrecord my-record [a])
(def r (new my-record 1))
(def s (new my-record 1))
(= r s);; true
(= s r);; true
(= r {:a 1}) ;; false
(= {:a 1} r) ;; true
Is this intentio
HI,
You'd be best served overriding the JPanel's paint or paintComponent
method (I'm fuzzy on the difference), and then calling repaint
periodically (at your desired frame rate). IIRC, repaint is safe to
call from any thread, and it will cause the paint methods to be called
in the swing thread.
Thanks George, I'll definitely grab that from Clojars.
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
fi
Cloning from http://github.com/GeorgeJahad/debug-repl.git, I see the
same
behavior (but a different namespace). The (overloaded, no arg)
expansion of
the debug-repl macro returns a form by using a normal quote.
The difference being between normal quote and syntax quote does mostly
answer
my quest
not at the repl. And instead of NO_SOURCE_FILE:58, it gave
me
my-file.clj:58 even though the line referred to is line 58 in the
debug.clj
file. Very confusing!
Ryan Twitchell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
