"juan.facorro" writes:
> Hi Clojurers,
>
[snip]
>
> There are parsing libraries which provide good parse trees (i.e. Parsley,
> Instaparse), but my understanding is that what needs to be
> mantained is a full abstract syntax tree for the whole code base and although
> clojure.tools.analyzer [4]
Hello everyone,
I found that a vector being associative really enlightening and
useful. But merge-with and other functions don't work, even though I
think it is not unreasonable to expect that. That is because
(seq [1 2 3 4]) is the seq of Long while (seq {0 1, 1 2, 2 3, 3
4}) is a seq of MapEntry
Am Sonntag, 11. April 2010 00:59:47 schrieb DanL:
> On 11 Apr., 00:34, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > > As far as I know, there were problems with the protocol using symbols
> > > in CL's package::symbol syntax (and some other characters not being
> > > allowed in Clojure) after changes in CVS
Hello,
At Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:21:03 -0800 (PST),
Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a short discussion on the SLIME mailinglist lead to the result that
> the arglist of a backend function in swank did change.
>
> Current checkouts of SLIME do not work with Clojure, at least if you
> use auto
e
effects.
Anyway, I suppose that doseq is the right idiom for communicating that you
want throw away the results.
--
Robert Ewald
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this
Hello,
Doing some small experiments I stumbled over map returning a lazy seq instead
of performing the function. I had to convert that to a doseq. Is there any
rationale for not having an eager map. Or was I just not reading the docs
properly?
--
Robert Ewald
