lementation).
Thank you again, you helped me a lot !
Le samedi 17 décembre 2016 18:24:26 UTC-5, Alex Miller a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 3:54:07 PM UTC-6, Rafo Ufoun wrote:
>>
>> Is there a special check when the equality is asked on map ?
>>
>
Very clear thank you !
I can't wait to know these concept as I am discovering clojure with the
'Functionnal programming for OO programmer' book. Thank you again
Le samedi 17 décembre 2016 18:53:31 UTC-5, James Reeves a écrit :
>
> On 17 December 2016 at 22:13, Rafo Ufoun
I'm a real newbe to clojure and functionnal programming but reading your
answer raised a question :
Where do you "store" the stopwatch object which you are passing to all your
functions ?
I understand that mutability is not needed to develop the functions you
described but all of them take a
Is there a special check when the equality is asked on map ?
I thought the evaluator evaluate all the expression the same way , by
substituting each expression contained in the list to other evaluators.
In the book, the author tells the substitution rule for function evaluation
is responsible f
Hi everyone,
I'm reading the excellent 'Functionnal programming for OO programmer' and I
encounter an issue understanding how the '=' function works.
We have a 'Triangle' structure defined by a map of 'Point's
so a Triangle is like {:point1 {:x 1 :y 1} :point2 {:x 1 :y 1} :point3 {:x
4 :y 2}}
Ok now I understand !
So this implementation of apply act like this, and all implementations
need, as the last arg of all the list, a sequence.
Thank you
Le mercredi 14 décembre 2016 13:59:40 UTC-5, James Reeves a écrit :
>
> On 14 December 2016 at 17:38, Rafo Ufoun > wrote:
>
ts.
>
> In most cases you don't need to use this technique because the performance
> gain will be minimal. My print-all function above is probably going to
> spend most of its time on I/O, making the optimisation all but useless in
> my example. But clojure.core is used everywhere, so
Hi everyone,
I'm new to clojure and I try to understand the apply function.
>From the clojure sources, I can see that there are several signatures for
this method: with or without additional arguments before the sequence.
According to these signatures, we can have 4 arguments MAX before gettin
