> Just curious, does the key need to be in the struct? (seeing you'll
> get key-value pairs anyhow if you use first/last etc - the info will
> still be there)
Excellent point! Given that I'll be using a sorted-map now, I don't
even need the structmap!
Thanks for the code...I like what you did w
On further reflection, perhaps the best approach would use sorted-map:
(defstruct example :msg :order)
(def a (struct "there" 2))
(def b (struct "hi" 1))
(def c (struct "everyone" 3))
We want our map to be sorted on the :order key. So:
(sorted-map (:order a) a (:order b) b (:order c) c)
I cou
I want to create a sorted-set of structmaps that are sorted on a
particular key of the structmap. The set was going to act as a queue,
and initially I implemented this using a PriorityQueue with a
Comparator I made using proxy. In general, I'd prefer to use pure
Clojure, and sorted-set seemed lik
Very clear explanation - I guess I thought that it would be possible
to to do the equivalent of (constantly 3) using the macro. I was just
overlooking the arity issue with the reduce call.
Thanks for taking the time to explain!
Cheers,
Rick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Using #() for "one off" functions, you get some odd behavior:
(reduce #(3) (range 1 100))
throws an exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args passed to:
eval--2365$fn
as does:
(reduce (fn [] 3) (range 1 100)
but:
(reduce (constantly 3) (range 1 100))
performs as one would
> Cool, thanks. That worked (http://jalat.com/static-files/
> Is it possible to have a subdirectory in the classpath
> as well, or does everything have to be from the root? (Ie. Could
> clojure have been in a subdirectory lib and classpath have been set to
> ". lib/"?)
> I tried that but it seems
On Oct 14, 10:04 am, Asbjørn Bjørnstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 10:23 pm, Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > for Michael Beauregard,
>
> > > Is there a reason why setting the "Main-Class" field in the jar's manifest
> > > doesn't work.
>
> > It work, and since
I was noticing that a lazy list seems to get forced as soon as you
create it on the Repl because printing it forces evaluation. (range 1
100), for example, produces:
(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
