Very clear explanation - I guess I thought that it would be possible
to to do the equivalent of (constantly 3) using the macro.  I was just
overlooking the arity issue with the reduce call.

Thanks for taking the time to explain!

Cheers,
Rick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to