Very clear explanation - I guess I thought that it would be possible to to do the equivalent of (constantly 3) using the macro. I was just overlooking the arity issue with the reduce call.
Thanks for taking the time to explain! Cheers, Rick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---