Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 28, 2:20�pm, John Harrop wrote:
>
>> One benefit of having a REPL: it makes regular expressions usable. So easy
>> to test and tweak your RE compared to the traditional compile/test/debug
>> cycle! I never even bothered with the java.util.regex package
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:29:24 +0530
Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
>
> Their concerns are thus:
>
> 1. How do you get Clojure programmers? Lisp is not for the faint
> hearted.
You can always ask on this list. I'd guess that at any given point
in time there are probably several people who'd rather b
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:44:00 -0600
Daniel Lyons wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Toralf Wittner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:22 -0600, Daniel Lyons wrote:
> >> If the actions are executed serially, what is the benefit of having
> >> multiple threads per agent?
> >
> > There is none.
Programming Erlang is also good. The syntax and message passing
emphasis aren't relevant to Clojure, but Erlang also uses immutable
data, and is definitely a functional language.
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:12:16 +0200
Robert Campbell wrote:
>
> Going beyond the language-specific Programming Clojure
Higher Order Perl. While I don't want to use Perl anymore, I do know it
very well, and it provided a good introduction to FP in a more familiar
language. YMMV.
Robert Campbell wrote:
> Going beyond the language-specific Programming Clojure book, what
> other books have best helped you make the
Try here:
http://code.google.com/p/clojure/source/browse/
Brett Morgan wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have some evil thoughts of using Clojure as a java library so that i
> can use both the STM and the persistent data structures in projects
> that my team of java developers can work with.
>
> As much
On Tue, 05 May 2009 09:39:21 +0200
Christophe Grand wrote:
>
> Kevin Downey a écrit :
> > (into {} (apply map vector
> > '((cars bmw chevrolet ford peugeot)
> > (genres adventure horror mystery
> >
> > {ford mystery, chevrolet horror, bmw adventure, cars ge
On Mon, 04 May 2009 16:31:21 +0200
Christophe Grand wrote:
>
> Nathan Hawkins a écrit :
> > Ok, my example seems to have misled. You're missing the point a
> > little bit:
> >
> > 1. I was trying to avoid the (reduce conj {} ...), by having the map
> &
On Mon, 4 May 2009 16:07:06 +0200
Christopher Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On 04.05.2009, at 15:47, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 4 May 2009 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
> > Drew Raines wrote:
> >>
> >> Whoops, that (seq) is a debug
On Mon, 4 May 2009 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Drew Raines wrote:
>
> On May 4, 8:05 am, Drew Raines wrote:
>
> > user> (let [test-str "foo=1;bar=2;baz=3"]
> > (reduce conj {}
> > (map #(apply hash-map (seq (.split % "=")))
> > (.split test-str ";"
>
> Whoops,
Possibly I'm going about this wrong. I'm trying to understand how best
to construct maps from sequences, by applying a function which returns a
key / value pair.
Something like this:
(ns test (:use clojure.contrib.str-utils))
(def test-str "foo=1;bar=2;baz=3")
(defn split-kv [text]
(let [[k
11 matches
Mail list logo
