Re: Why is this so difficult?

2013-02-15 Thread MarkH
I too suggest taking a second look at CCW. I'll never be an Emacs guy and current CCW should be an almost seamless setup with Lein. On Friday, February 15, 2013 8:53:47 AM UTC-6, lpetit wrote: > > Hello, > > 2013/2/15 BJG145 >: > > Jules sums up pretty exactly where I was at...tried CCW, nope,

Re: Recommendation for Clojure Enterprise Development toolkit

2011-07-09 Thread MarkH
As a tech lead or architect you should be fired for even suggesting to use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously considers Clojure for enterprise systems. On Jul 8, 12:43 pm, Colin Yates wrote: > *This i

Re: ANN: ClojureQL 1.0.0 finally released as public beta

2010-11-18 Thread MarkH
On Nov 18, 1:10 pm, LauJensen wrote: > Hi gents, > > For those of you who have followed the development > of ClojureQL over the past 2.5 years you'll be excited > to know that ClojureQL is as of today being released > as 1.0.0 beta1. > > That means that the significant primitives from Relational

Re: clojure-clr and mono

2010-10-09 Thread MarkH
On Oct 9, 9:21 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > On Oct 9, 2:53 am, MarkH wrote: > > > Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday.  You don't have to wait for your > > distro to package it up.  Building official source releases are as > > easy as ./configure && make &

Re: clojure-clr and mono

2010-10-09 Thread MarkH
On Oct 9, 9:21 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > On Oct 9, 2:53 am, MarkH wrote: > > > Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday.  You don't have to wait for your > > distro to package it up.  Building official source releases are as > > easy as ./configure && make &

Re: clojure-clr and mono

2010-10-08 Thread MarkH
Mono 2.8 just came out yesterday. You don't have to wait for your distro to package it up. Building official source releases are as easy as ./configure && make && make install. I just did it last night. On Oct 8, 7:23 am, Sampo Vuori wrote: > Hello, > I would be very interested in getting cloju

Re: Thinking in Clojure

2010-09-03 Thread MarkH
Sean and Peter made comments that ring very true for me. I've always had a problem with Java/Smalltalk/C# type OO. I also thought the Common Lisp/Dylan way of generic functions and data structures made more sense. Like Peter mentioned, I tend to think in terms of verbs and transformations of dat

Re: New release of the enclojure plugin is up.

2009-04-09 Thread MarkH
Enclojure is shaping up to be a really nice development environment for Clojure. Great work Eric. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googleg

Re: Java Posse exposure

2009-03-23 Thread MarkH
Thanks for the article. I found it very informative. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: alternate syntax

2009-02-23 Thread MarkH
Yes, clojure needs an alternative surface syntax for obvious reasons. And anybody that brings up Dylan as a counter-example doesn't know what they're talking about. Dylan died because Apple killed it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you ar