Sean and Peter made comments that ring very true for me. I've always had a problem with Java/Smalltalk/C# type OO. I also thought the Common Lisp/Dylan way of generic functions and data structures made more sense. Like Peter mentioned, I tend to think in terms of verbs and transformations of data. It just makes a lot more sense to me.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
