That's unforeseeable because, that represents a very long time.
Having said that, this statement deserves a resay...
*The JVM will remain the primary target/platform for Clojure, while Oracle
remains good i.e. it doesn't get Barmy*.
What say the other people?
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:5
'Always' is not the right term to ask this question. I have the same
question, but it could be asked with the better choice of words.
Leon
On Dec 27, 4:26 pm, Sukh Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that this question is randomly appearing in many minds, and
> it is frequently being asked, th
When I asked my close friend, he answered that till there's a *j* in clo*j*ure,
stay calm.
Thank you all again.
On Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:45:01 PM UTC+5:30, Leon Adler wrote:
>
> Thanks Andy. I will do that. :)
> Thank you all.
>
> Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> >
Thanks Andy. I will do that. :)
Thank you all.
Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Leon Adler wrote:
>
> > This post was not meant for any queries on the release schedules of the
> > various Clojure versions, but for a curious question -- "Will Clo
Thanks Andy. I will do that. :)
Thank you all.
Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Leon Adler wrote:
>
> > This post was not meant for any queries on the release schedules of the
> > various Clojure versions, but for a curious question -- "Will Clo
Will that change? If yes, to what? Parrot? Or CLR?
On Nov 25, 3:45 am, Michael Klishin
wrote:
> 2012/11/25 Leon Adler
>
> > By official, I meant, the most 'in development' version, with most of
> > the community following...
>
> That is JVM Clojure toda
By official, I meant, the most 'in development' version, with most of
the community following... Will that change in the case of the JVM
version?
On Nov 25, 3:17 am, Michael Klishin
wrote:
> 2012/11/25 Leon Adler
>
> > So, JVM will officially remain the primary platf
So, JVM will officially remain the primary platform for further future
developments on and of the language?
Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2012/11/25 Leon Adler
>
> > Here I am talking about the version of the future which will be
> > developed and used and supported by Rich Hicke
nt "towards ClojureScript sans JVM" ;-)
>
> > >> 2012/11/25 David Nolen :
> > >> > ClojureScript dev is actively working towards Clojure sans JVM.
>
> > >> > On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Leon Adler wrote:
>
> > >> >> Hi,
hose releases. I have no idea if they are open to making such a
> contract with you, or how much money they would want to do so.
>
> If you are looking for something other than those, it might help to
> explain better what you are looking for. Some kind of verbal promise from
> the de
he primary Clojure platform in the distant
future? (Virtually forever?)
***When I think of Scala or Groovy, I get a feeling that they will still
be known as JVM languages in the future, as they are now. What about
Clojure? Can I safely put Clojure in the league of Scala?
-Leon Adler
--
Yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
