When I asked my close friend, he answered that till there's a *j* in clo*j*ure, stay calm.
Thank you all again. On Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:45:01 PM UTC+5:30, Leon Adler wrote: > > Thanks Andy. I will do that..... :) > Thank you all. > > Andy Fingerhut wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Leon Adler wrote: > > > > > This post was not meant for any queries on the release schedules of > the various Clojure versions, but for a curious question -- "Will Clojure > (take all the upcomming versions back-to-back) remain to be known as the > JVM language anytime in the future?". You can say, that this question > arises from curiosity :), but there is more. > > > > > > Lets' take Scala (scala runs on CLR too, but is still known as the JVM > language, and it seems, will remain so) or Groovy. Nobody assured me about > their future, but somewhere I know, that they will remain to be developed > as the ''JVM languages''. Can I put Clojure in their league? > > > > Leon: > > > > Here is a suggestion. Take the mental process by which you did this: > "Nobody assured me about their future, but somewhere I know, that they will > remain to be developed as the "JVM languages".' > > > > Do a replacement of the words Scala and Groovy with Clojure in that > mental process, and Bob's your uncle. > > > > Somehow I just know that this will work. > > > > Andy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
