I saw your PR for io.aviso/pretty ... thanks!
I can't imagine how much work it must be to track all of those things down
...
On Friday, 19 August 2016 11:35:31 UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> One thing to note is that the new specs for clojure.core means that there
> is a reasonable amount of (br
I hit this too and after an embarrasingly long time, found out the `lein clean`
took care of it; I had some previously AOTed code lying around in target.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@goo
There's a number of options out there for collecting small recurring
payments. I already make regular payments to Wikipedia and a couple of
others (including GitHub), and would be willing to kick in some money
towards Clojars.
The question is: what is a reasonable amount? This is tricky; I'm
>
> Looking forward to this ... any ideas on submitted issues w/ valid patches
> that are in limbo? (*)
>
(*) No good deed, such as this beta release announcement, goes unpunished.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
On Monday, 25 November 2013 18:12:28 UTC-8, Paul Biggar wrote:
>
> [FYI: I'm the author/forker of stefon]
>
> These libraries aren't bad, but to be honest, I think we've done it all
> wrong. We're just all scratching our own itches, not writing reusable
> components (unlike most of the rest of
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 11:11:56 UTC-8, Magnar Sveen wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:08:34 PM UTC+1, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
>
>> Howard has quite some experience with this and I'd expect he put a great
>> deal of that into the new library. :-)
>>
>
> Indeed. There's
Any idea how I can push that patch I submitted (toString for functions)
along? It's in purgatory now.
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 13:04:19 UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> Clojure 1.6.0-alpha2 is now available.
>
> Try it via
> - Download:
> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/
On Jul 19, 1:24 pm, Vagif Verdi wrote:
> On Jul 19, 9:49 am, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
>
> > There are already two webframework in clojure being developed.
> > Compojure and cascade. While I'm eagerly waiting to see how these two
> > and others will envole
>
> Not much to wait there. Compojur
