On 12/01/2009 08:51 PM, Fogus wrote:
%< -
> I think learning C (it was my 3rd language) is likewise
> important, but it's heavy in incidental complexities that just muddle
> the problem at hand and probably not good as a start. New programmers
> need to solve as many problems as they can
Just want to second everyone pointing to SICP. A better in-depth
introduction to programming has yet to grace my desk.There are also
video lectures available on line:
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/
If this material had been so readily available in t
Hi,
I don't post here much and so you may see that as a reason to discount
what I say. Infact that would probably be a good plan. I generally
talk a load of twaddle. With those caveats firmly in mind here's my
tuppence worth.
I'd hate to think your first language is defining as you suggest
2008/12/12 Geoffrey Teale
>
>>
> Hi,
>
> Depending on which version of Clojure you are using you may find that you
> need to change:
>
> (doto button
> (resize 250 100))
>
> to:
>
> (doto button
>
Argh.. goddam google mail... I meant to say:
in this context
> (NO_SOURCE_FILE:44)
>
>
Hi,
Depending on which version of Clojure you are using you may find that you
need to change:
(doto button
(resize 250 100))
to:
(doto button
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Software and Technology Consultant
Munich, Germany
--~--~-~
s quite naturally to a
OOP style of programming when interacting Qt-Jambi. I'm torn as to whether
this is a good or a bad thing (it may be neither, just a reality).
Realising this certainly made doing this kind of work more intuitive - and
(super) would actually solve some problems for me.
eekend changing over some Qt-Jambi based code to
use the new (:gen-class) stuff - and whilst it was a lot of work I had an
immense amount of fun. I guess it's a question of presenting me with the
right kind of problems, but still, it's an awful lot of fun.
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Sof
.
So, Tobias also indicated that he would welcome the swank-clojure being
included as a contribution to the main SLIME project. I promised I would
pass that message on, and so I have.
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Software and Technology Consultant
Munich, Germany
er is the answer I needed, but it was
not at all obvious to a relative "Java innocent".
All is good! Thanks very much.
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Software and Technology Consultant
Munich, Germany
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
3369)
at clojure.core$compile__4456.invoke(core.clj:3368)
at user$eval__2.invoke(compile.clj:2)
at clojure.lang.Compiler.eval(Compiler.java:4109)
... 7 more
What am I doing wrong?
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Software and Technology Consultant
Munich, Germany
--~--~-~
2008/11/21 Boris Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Nice!. As a newbie, I found lispbox one of the easiest ways to set up
> a lisp + emacs on windows, so I think a clojurebox will be a good
> thing for people.
>
> (although currently I'm just using ssh to get to my work and emacs -nw
> from there.)
>
2008/11/19 Allen Rohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Nov 18, 5:16 pm, BerlinBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What projects have you used clojure for? Have you completed them? Are
> > they one-off projects. Small big? Is it web based, a GUI?
> >
> > I am working on this, haven't made much prog
2008/11/18 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- %< ---
> That being said, why can't clojure.org be used for that purpose? If I
> remember correctly, all it takes is some DNS magic, and we have a,
> say, project.clojure.org. Hosted on another physical machine, if need
> be.
>
That gets my vote!
+1
--
I'm from the UK, but I live in Munich, Germany.
2008/11/17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> +1 for Baltimore.
>
> On Oct 17, 8:12 am, Paul Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Baltimore, Maryland, US
> >
> > On Oct 17, 5:27 am, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hel
> > For the book would people rather see Swing or Qt Jambi examples?
>
I practice Qt Jambi is a much better UI layer than Swing, but then so is
SWT.
If you teach the general principles of Clojure then using any of them should
be easy enough. As Graham said, it's better to stick with the out of
inging in
all that Lisp goodness means that Clojure is as close to my "dream
language" as you can probably get.
Thanks Rich, et al!
--
Geoffrey Teale
Freelance Software and Technology Consultant
Munich, Germany
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this me
16 matches
Mail list logo