On Feb 23, 11:29 am, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> I hate to sound like a Smug Lisp Weenie™, but if people want to learn
> Clojure, they're going to have to get comfortable with its
> syntax. Parentheses aren't some embarrassing historical accident;
> they're part of the reason lisps are so powerful.
On Feb 18, 10:18 am, Oliver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if there's any way of getting hold of the Clojure
> documentation for usage offline? There's no download link online and
> it doesn't appear in SVN. I attempted to scrape the site but it ended
> in failure, and there probably should be
On Dec 16, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Tom Hickey wrote:
>
> Hey Rich,
>
> Eric and I were also wondering if the logo was under the same license
> as Clojure itself. If it is, should this be explicitly stated
> somewhere?
I think using a license designed for code is slightly inappropriate
for artwork.
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> It's been a month since Clojure rev. 1094 introduced the namespace-is-
> file change. Are people still using releases that require the old
> contrib directories, or can we safely delete them?
I was confused yesterday as to why my copy of test
On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
> Also, does anybody know how gain any degree or kind of control over
> signal handling in Java? Preferably pure Java, but since everything
> I do
> is on Linux, a native-code solution for that platform would be
> acceptable.
Not in a porta
On Nov 16, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Jeff Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> For that matter, a standard clj script
>> or executable should probably be a part of the package too.
>
> A big +1! Everybody shouldn't have to write this script the
