On Dec 16, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Tom Hickey wrote:
> > Hey Rich, > > Eric and I were also wondering if the logo was under the same license > as Clojure itself. If it is, should this be explicitly stated > somewhere? I think using a license designed for code is slightly inappropriate for artwork. I don't want to start yet another license war, but maybe a creative commons license would be a better fit? The attribution- share-alike[0] license seems to share the spirit of Clojure's license. :dudley [0] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
