On 11 Apr., 00:34, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > As far as I know, there were problems with the protocol using symbols
> > in CL's package::symbol syntax (and some other characters not being
> > allowed in Clojure) after changes in CVS Slime about five months ago.
>
> So it would just need t
On 10 Apr., 19:44, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the history but is there any reason why
> swank-clojure isn't being integrated into the SLIME distribution
> itself? That should make it easier to make it work out of the box.
As far as I know, there were problems with the
Hello!
On 10 Apr., 18:57, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> > Like Ævar, I am not aware of any other language mode that makes the
> > usual way of installing/configuring as hard asswank-clojure. That is
> > why I use a pretty ancient version of it, which in turn prevents me
> > from using the latest cvs s
Hello!
On 8 Apr., 18:36, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > Both those options sound like an awful lot of work. I'm curious as to
> > what advantages there are to this method over the original
> > installation instructions.
>
> They're only a lot of work because the existing .el code all assumes
Hello!
On 28 Feb., 18:08, Аркадий Рост wrote:
> Hi!
>
> hmm...I don't understand why clojure when and if simultaneously? What
> is the diffirences between them and when I should use one instead
> another one?
Besides the implicit do, which reynard mentioned, it's generally
idiomatic to use while
Hello!
On 29 Jan., 20:14, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> CL find as I understand it: (some (partial = x) some-coll). Sufficiently ugly
> to show performance characteristics.
> CL member as I understand it: (drop-while (partial not= x) some-coll).
> Sufficiently ugly to show performance characterist
Hello!
On 29 Jan., 11:24, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/f2585c149cd0465d
Rich has valid points but still, bad performance characteristics might
be something that I, the user, should take responsibility for. I'm not
sure if such considerations should preven
Hello!
On 29 Jan., 03:49, Sean Devlin wrote:
> I'd do one thing differently than Tim. (partial = something) is a
> clojure smell. It's more idiomatic to use a set
>
> (if (some #{"foo"} ["foo" "bar"]) "yay" "humbug")
In my opinion, there really should be something like CL's FIND or
MEMBER in c
On 29 Jan., 02:05, Mike Meyer wrote:
> IIRC, some Pre-CL lisps had four function definition facilities: You
> could either get all your arguments evaluated, or not; and you could
> get your arguments bound to variables, or just get the list of
> them. The former turned into macros, because that wa
Hello!
On 28 Jan., 23:00, Raoul Duke wrote:
> > Doesn't extend to arbitrary number of arguments, though.
>
> that was sorta a deal-breaker. :)
That I show you this doesn't necessarily mean that you should use it:
(let [x [true true false true]]
(eval `(and ~...@x)))
--
You received thi
Hello!
On 28 Jan., 21:26, Raoul Duke wrote:
[...]
> (if (vec final-answer) ...)
[...]
I think you expect "nil punning" which was dropped before the 1.0
release. Think like this: If you have an empty basket, is that nothig
or still an empty basket?
> (when '() 'yay)
yay
The idiomatic way to te
Hello!
On 28 Jan., 21:10, Raoul Duke wrote:
[...]
> even if the result of evaluating the lazy sequence would be the value 'false'.
[...]
When exactly would a lazy sequence evaluate to false?
Regards
dhl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gr
Hello!
On 27 Jan., 22:49, Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Matt Revelle wrote:
> > In general, if you see a form that looks like it's a special language
> > and wouldn't evaluate its
> > contents before executing the form then it's a macro.
>
> but that is a chicken-egg thing
On 12 Okt., 20:46, Greg wrote:
> Forgive me, but I'm unfamiliar with the readtable, are you just
> referring to where this syntax might be implemented? Or are you
> suggesting an alternative syntax?
I'm suggesting that the readtable might be exposed to user changes as
it is in CL, but only
I'm aware that this already has been discussed, and until recently I
was content with clojure not exposing the readtable, because of the
inherent modular problems. However, for CL, a nice approach to
readtables was lately released:
http://trittweiler.blogspot.com/2009/10/ann-named-readtables-09.h
On 7 Okt., 20:34, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> [...] it's simply not supported [...]
I'm pretty sure that it used to work some time ago.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this gro
Although I didn't solve the problem, I can confirm it.
I'm using latest clojure, slime, swank-clojure (pulled daily), and
Cygwin Emacs 23 on XP.
On 22 Jul., 22:45, Kelvin Ward wrote:
> I've been using EmacsW32 withSLIME. Whenever I call (read-line) in
> theREPLit never completes reading the inp
17 matches
Mail list logo
