On 12 Okt., 20:46, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote:

> Forgive me, but I'm unfamiliar with the readtable, are you just  
> referring to where this syntax might be implemented? Or are you  
> suggesting an alternative syntax?

I'm suggesting that the readtable might be exposed to user changes as
it is in CL, but only if a means of managing different readtables is
provided, hence the link pointing to named-readtables, which allows
just that (naming and merging readtables using an API resembling the
package API). This would allow introduction of new reader macros by
the user.

As I said, there already was some discussion on that topic, but I just
have played around with named-readtables since the new release and
came to the conclusion, that something akin to them might be nice in
clojure, too. Things like heredocs are not something that every user
needs every day, so they would, IMHO, be a good candidate for a user
readmacro.

Regards,

dhl
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to