On Saturday, November 1, 2014 12:09:33 AM UTC-4, Dylan Butman wrote:
>
> Is it hard to actually send the log? Are you purposefully uncooperative to
> people trying to help?
>
My inspection of the log indicates that the amount of information
(namespace names, other things) about what I'm working
That's an excellent idea, currently at least test.check hacks on top of
clojure.test by using macros that emit clojure.test tests.
Beyond that it seems that the #1 wish is better output. I don't think that
ought to be very hard for us to pull off as a community.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 P
Thanks for all of the feedback so far, it's been helpful. Mars0i, keeping
an RNG for each thing that needs to have an independent random state seems
like a good idea for a fallback, and the suggestion of using a different
RNG is a good one. It's also helpful to know other people have dealt with
Is it hard to actually send the log? Are you purposefully uncooperative to
people trying to help?
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
>> On Friday, October 31, 2014 11:44:49 PM UTC-4, Luc wrote:
>> I'll repeat myself :
>>
>> '...guessing which error is
>> relevant or no
On Friday, October 31, 2014 11:44:49 PM UTC-4, Luc wrote:
>
> I'll repeat myself :
>
> '...guessing which error is
> relevant or not is an educated guess at best except if you are deep in
> Eclipse plugins coding.'
>
> Laurent stated clearly that saving
> a file triggers a number of things
>
I'll repeat myself :
'...guessing which error is
relevant or not is an educated guess at best except if you are deep in
Eclipse plugins coding.'
Laurent stated clearly that saving
a file triggers a number of things
in several plugins.
There could be suspicious messages in the log
that have not
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
> It's not *my* fault the log file doesn't contain anything unusual between
> before the hang happened and after recovery. If CCW didn't log anything
> that helps indicate what was different or unusual on that occasion of
> saving, then the
On Friday, October 31, 2014 6:23:42 PM UTC-4, Luc wrote:
>
> Just curious, how can you expect a fix if you do not provide any
> information that
> could support a serious investigation ?
>
> I read the eclipse log file from time to time and guessing which error is
> relevant or not is an educat
Thanks for checking it out! (:
That is an unfortunately great point about implicits, I apologize! It's
been in my head so long that I didn't realize that I never explained them.
My concisest way of explaining implicits would be automatic glue code
generation. You already have these functions an
+1 to something like humane-test-output being part of core library.
There is value for the community to have some foundation library share
across our test frameworks? Something like `test.runners`, to encapsulate
error reporting and organization? Bit crazy, I know, but the idea come
after seein
Would be great if humane-test-output was part of clojure.test. Would make
it easier for beginners to find it.
On Friday, October 31, 2014 11:19:11 PM UTC+8, Eli Naeher wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ashton Kemerling > wrote:
>
>
>> It's my opinion that these two libraries are lar
Just curious, how can you expect a fix if you do not provide any information
that
could support a serious investigation ?
I read the eclipse log file from time to time and guessing which error is
relevant or not is an educated guess at best except if you are deep in
Eclipse plugins coding.
Creat
Your first implementation probably failed because map is lazy, so none of
the '.write' calls happened during the with-open block. Try doseq.
On Friday, October 31, 2014 1:08:01 PM UTC-7, Sam Raker wrote:
>
> I'm writing some stuff to interact with the Twitter API. I want to be able
> to write
On Friday, October 31, 2014 2:24:04 PM UTC-4, Laurent PETIT wrote:
>
> Also, if you can attach the workspace's .metadata/.log file, I can take a
> look at it.
>
I have no idea how to reproduce it, which is part of the problem: I don't
know what to avoid doing, in order to ensure it doesn't happ
Picking up the variadic arguments discussion, it seems that in a simple
definition like
(fn [& args] (apply f arg1 args))
One could conceivably put some sort of preprocessing smarts into the fn
macro that notices that
a) this is a variadic arglist
b) the variadic arg (args) is a symbol, not so
I'm writing some stuff to interact with the Twitter API. I want to be able
to write tweets (as JSON) to a file, so I can, e.g., test things without
connecting to the API. I've proxied the LinkedBlockingQueue that Twitter's
HBC library uses to use an agent, so ideally I want to be able to write t
*Plinio: *Thanks!
*John: *Hi!
I noticed that as well but I couldn't figure out an approach that would
unify those terms, other than going through each of them and identifying
the ones that are equivalent. Maybe grouping by the distance between any
two terms? Or maybe if the ratio between the d
Hello,
I'm the main CCW developer.
I have double checked the source code, and can confirm that the save
mechanism is handled by Eclipse. So one can expect it to be as stable as
every other save action performed in the Eclipse IDE.
There are a number of listeners that are triggered after the Save
Nice, thanks!
On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:59:26 AM UTC-7, Daniel wrote:
>
> Brian, this may help: https://github.com/ztellman/collection-check
>
> On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:24:48 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote:
>>
>> Following up on the thread about the massive overhead of String, I tried
>>
Brian, this may help: https://github.com/ztellman/collection-check
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:24:48 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote:
>
> Following up on the thread about the massive overhead of String, I tried
> writing a string collection type that stores strings as bytes, converting
> to Strin
Neat!
I notice that in the results for "name one language feature you'd like to
see added", the following items show up separately, though should probably
be combined: StartupTime, FasterStartup, FastStartup, StartTime,
CompileTime.
Similarly, in "most glaring weakness", lumped together are St
Hi Michael,
Good point, thank you for mentioning it. Unfortunately we are not hiring
remote workers at this time. This role is fulltime on site in Redwood City,
California.
Regards, Grant
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Michael Klishin <
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 October 201
I totally agree about pr-str in test.check. Quite often I want to copy and
paste the failure into a repl and play around, but need to re-add missing
quotation marks or quote lists.
> On 31 Oct 2014, at 22:05, Jessica Kerr wrote:
>
> My top wish it more readable output from test.check when run
My top wish it more readable output from test.check when running within
clojure.test
In particular, I want to know the value of each generated parameter at the
first failure, and at the simplest failure. Currently that prints as part
of a map, but if empty-string is generated, that does not sho
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ashton Kemerling wrote:
> It's my opinion that these two libraries are largely complete aside from
> some human interface improvements (quality of output for example), but
> clearly not everyone agrees with me.
>
Hi Ashton,
Check out https://github.com/pjstadig
Hi,
I too, am super interested in games in Clojure. My other background is
cryptography, so I break out the crypto. I would say that you don’t really want
a PRG, but you might want a PRF instead. (If that doesn’t mean anything to you,
don’t worry, read on.)
My favorite cryptographic hash func
"I tweeted recently that I thought that Clojure is super testable, and I
was genuinely surprised about the number of people who disagreed with me."
My 2c.
Without explicitly citing those complaints, it will be difficult to conduct
a meaningful debate.
2014-10-31 14:52 GMT+00:00 Ashton Kemerling
I don't want to speak for others, I notified everyone involved on Twitter that
I made this thread so they can voice their own complaints.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:02 AM, László Török wrote:
> "I tweeted recently that I thought that Clojure is super testable, and I
> was genuinely surprised abo
Hi Christian,
your patch looks, like it should be straightforward to port to my work, but
it won't apply as is, since I moved the emitter into its own namespace.
I can take care of that, as soon as your CA goes through. Of course, I'd
also welcome a patch based on my branch ;-)
cheers
--
You re
I tweeted recently that I thought that Clojure is super testable, and I was
genuinely surprised about the number of people who disagreed with me.
There's been a lively discussion about what the best testing frameworks in
clojure currently are, and what the built in solutions (clojure.test and
On 31 October 2014 at 17:13:15, Grant Du Plooy (gr...@tolfrey.com) wrote:
> Yummly's iOS app is already the #1 recipe app, and our site receives
> 15M monthly unique visitors. Details here:http://jobsco.re/1uhrReN
Grant,
Many potential candidates would greatly appreciate if you clarify your
Christian, thanks for working on the enhancements.
It might be easiest to wait until the dust settles on the other big changes
in the works right now. You could also contact Herwig Hochleitner (
hhochleit...@gmail.com), who is developing those other data.xml changes,
and ask him if perhaps the po
I don't know whether this group permits job posts, so this will be a
one-time post.
Yummly, a growing startup in the food tech revolution, has an exciting
opportunity for a Software Engineer (Clojure) to work on various components
of Yummly's service-oriented system that powers our website and
Oh, dear, did I leave a trailing reference in my headers?
Mars0i writes:
> Phil, I think your post accidentally ended up in the wrong place. I
> believe you intended to create a new thread.
>
> On Friday, October 31, 2014 4:55:39 AM UTC-5, Phillip Lord wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to pass a java
Phil, I think your post accidentally ended up in the wrong place. I
believe you intended to create a new thread.
On Friday, October 31, 2014 4:55:39 AM UTC-5, Phillip Lord wrote:
>
>
>
> I want to pass a java method call to a function. So instead of this:
> ...
>
--
You received this message
+1. When I first read that post I thought he was joking!
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:19:29 UTC, Marcus Blankenship wrote:
>
> Agreed. I've been amazed at how kind this group has been, despite your
> attitude of disrespect toward them.
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Dylan Butman > wro
Hi
Currently data.xml doesn't currently support the specification of
doctypes when emitting XML (see
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/DXML-10). I created a patch to
support this. Now it appears that data.xml is in the midst of a big
refactoring so I'm wondering if and how I should attach the pa
I want to pass a java method call to a function. So instead of this:
(defn call-method []
(.getCanonicalName Object))
I have something like this...
(defn indirect-call [f clazz]
(f clazz))
(defn indirect-call-memfn []
(indirect-call (memfn ^java.lang.Class getCanonicalName) Object))
38 matches
Mail list logo
