I tweeted recently that I thought that Clojure is super testable, and I was genuinely surprised about the number of people who disagreed with me.
There's been a lively discussion about what the best testing frameworks in clojure currently are, and what the built in solutions (clojure.test and test.check) are lacking. While a lot of people recommend midje or expectations, I generally prefer the built in options (no offense to contributors of either of those libraries) and usually recommend people stick with clojure.test for its lack of magic. It's my opinion that these two libraries are largely complete aside from some human interface improvements (quality of output for example), but clearly not everyone agrees with me. So let's talk about what we could add to make the clojure testing experience superior compared to other languages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
