Counterpoint! He's not crazy:
https://github.com/bwo/monads/blob/master/src/monads/util.clj#L8-43
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> You're crazy :)
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Chris Allen
> wrote:
> > Am I crazy or does this scream macro?
> >
> > On Saturday, Augu
The idea of Datomic as an approach to scalable working memory is
interesting. I haven't looked at the mechanics of doing this, but it seems
possible since Clara aims to separate the working memory system from the
rule logic and Rete network. Also, the approach I've taken here aligns
with Datom
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 1:41:56 PM UTC-7, Ryan Brush wrote:
>
> Shantanu,
>
> I appreciate it. I did look at Mimir, but had some different objectives,
> and therefore tradeoffs, and didn't see a straightforward way to reconcile
> them.
>
> First, I wanted to use existing data models in the ru
You're crazy :)
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Chris Allen wrote:
> Am I crazy or does this scream macro?
>
> On Saturday, August 17, 2013 6:02:03 PM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, yair wrote:
>> > What do you mean by currying in this context? Is there a wa
Am I crazy or does this scream macro?
On Saturday, August 17, 2013 6:02:03 PM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, yair >
> wrote:
> > What do you mean by currying in this context? Is there a way to do this
> in
> > clojure apart from using partial?
>
> (defn some
I prefer to use closures / higher order functions that return a function.
Reasons:
- You typically get much better performance by returning a closure.
"partial" uses "apply", which adds a lot of overhead
- It can result in cleaner user code (partials require a bit of mental
decoding, and you can
What:
A Clojure wrapper for Joda Time
Where:
https://github.com/clj-time/clj-time
Details:
An API cleanup that deprecates several inconsistent / abbreviated
names and introduces preferred replacements. Deprecated API will
remain under 0.7.0 so you will have plenty of time to update yo
I was looking at techempower benchmarks [1] and noticed that fastest (by
their measurements) Java HTTP server - Undertow - had no Ring adapter. I
felt like it and wrote one just for fun:
https://github.com/piranha/ring-undertow-adapter
Installation and usage is pretty standard, put
[ring-und
Shantanu,
I appreciate it. I did look at Mimir, but had some different objectives,
and therefore tradeoffs, and didn't see a straightforward way to reconcile
them.
First, I wanted to use existing data models in the rules as is -- be it
Clojure records, Java Beans, or other structures. Drools
Thanks for posting. I will certainly explore this.
Did you look at Mimir? https://github.com/hraberg/mimir Could you outline
how is Clara's approach different from Mimir?
Shantanu
On Sunday, 18 August 2013 23:46:14 UTC+5:30, Ryan Brush wrote:
>
> Perhaps the best aspect of Clojure is how it can
Hi John,
Building on Ray's answer to use Upstart, I've recently started using a
Git-based deployment method that essentially uses a Git post-receive hook
to re-deploy the application with a simple git push.
To set-up, create a bare repo and a working tree on the deploy host, and
the relevant U
On 18 August 2013 12:31, Timo Mihaljov wrote:
> On 17.08.2013 08:40, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> Which led me to this:
>>
>> (defn to-consolidated-map [parts]
>> (apply merge-with + (map (partial apply hash-map) parts)))
>
> This is exactly what I came up with after reading your first message.
> A
On 18 August 2013 17:21, John Jacobsen wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Ray Miller wrote:
>
>> One option is simply to write an upstart script that invokes 'lein
>> ring server-headless' and sit an apache or nginx proxy in front of it.
>> That's how my website is currently running. Alternat
Perhaps the best aspect of Clojure is how it can adopt the best ideas from
other domains to concisely solve problems, as we've seen with core.logic,
core.async and other libraries. I recently came across a problem domain
that is easily expressed in forward-chaining rules, and found Clojure to be
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:21 AM, John Jacobsen wrote:
> My main concern was just the need to ssh into the server and run leiningen in
> the background, as opposed to setting up a "real" server which starts at boot
> time. I'm OK w/ wrapping 'lein ring server-headless' with Apache/Nginx, if
> t
I'm happy to announce that Langohr [1] documentation is being actively
worked on again. There's already one full new guide available [2],
that covers RabbitMQ extensions and how to use them from Clojure.
At least two more guides (TLS/SSL support and Durability) are in the works
and will be publish
I don't think there is a such thing as a "real" server. Any process that
listens on a TCP port and talks HTTP is a legitimate server, regardless of
when or how it's started up.
Upstart is a fine way to run your server and make sure it's restarted if it
dies. It's not hacky or unconventional, in fa
Hi,
I wrote a set of functions to compare 2 words managing the keyboard
mistakes. The common mistakes are insertion, deletion, substitution or
inversion.
It can be useful for searching name, product reference, city
For example, if you want to let 2 errors in an input, you can do:
;; a na
Many thanks to everyone who replied about deploying a Web server to production.
Specific replies:
On Aug 17, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Mark Mandel wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:52 AM, John Jacobsen wrote:
>> After some prototyping and development, we are now getting to the stage
>> where "le
Here's a version that allows values to be anywhere in the tree:
(defn insert [[container values] [letter & letters] value]
(if letter
[(update-in container [letter] #(insert % letters value)) values]
[container (conj values value)]))
e.g. (-> [{} []] (insert "foo" 4) (insert "f" 5) (ins
This is close, though it only permits values at leaves and stores the
values in the reverse order. Depending on what you need, this might be
sufficient:
(defn insert [container letters value]
(update-in container letters #(conj % value)))
e.g. (-> {} (insert "foo" 3) (insert "foo" 4) (insert "b
It might be Huffman coding but I don't know Hoffman coding in depth, so I
can't be precise. :)
But any way, it is a snippet written in an imperative style that I'm trying
to transfer into a functional one.
The amount of mutation and the if statements are blocking me from doing it
in Clojure.
Can you explain what the code is supposed to do in English? Java is a
little hard to read. :-)
Are you doing Huffman coding or similar?
On 18 August 2013 16:51, Hussein B. wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Would you please help me transforming this imperative code into functional
> one?
>
> The code is a typic
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:52 PM, John Jacobsen wrote:
> So, what do all y'all do? What is a good lightweight but robust way to
> get a fairly simple Compojure/Ring app backed by Datomic facing the outside
> world? Not too worried about massive scalability at this point; simplicity
> will be a pl
Hi!
Would you please help me transforming this imperative code into functional
one?
The code is a typical snippet in imperative style. A lot of mutations that
I don't even know how to start morphing it to Clojure.
class Container {
Map children;
String letter;
List value;
}
void insert(
I'll come back to you with the benchmarks, so far I haven't done any. I
have an impression that ConcurrentHashMap will outperform TransactionalMap
in most cases, but there may be cases when different keys end up in the
same bucket in the ConcurrentHashMap and that is where TransactionalMap may
Thank you! Great question.
I couldn't devise a way to merge concurrent changes in a HashMap using
Clojure's STM. A while ago I discussed it with Christophe Grand and he had
his own idea about how to fix it: [1] and [2]. IIRC Christophe's solution
may see a conflict even if there's no real confl
If you use a singleton sentinel value that is generated privately within
the core.async implementation, then the sentinel isn't really a regular
"value" in the sense that it can be created by regular user code.
nil, on the other hand, gets used very frequently as a value in regular
Clojure code
On 17.08.2013 08:40, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Which led me to this:
>
> (defn to-consolidated-map [parts]
> (apply merge-with + (map (partial apply hash-map) parts)))
This is exactly what I came up with after reading your first message.
Apparently Jay Fields took the same approach. I think it's
That's really cool.
Do you have any performance benchmark between TransactionalMap and
java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap? When should i use these
collections instead of java.util.concurrent.* collections?
2013/8/18 Ivan Koblik
> Hi All,
>
> Almost 4 years ago I developed STM with semant
On 18/08/2013 2:00 PM, "Alexandr Kurilin" wrote:
>
> I'd love to know your expert opinion on this, since you wrote Bouncer: say
> you're in the situation I listed above, where you don't care about nice
> error handling, you just want to give the caller a 400 if the input is
> incorrect. Would you
Great ! Congratulations!
How it does compare with Clojure's builtin STM?
Thanks.
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:24:48 AM UTC+2, Ivan Koblik wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Almost 4 years ago I developed STM with semantic concurrency control for
> my project at CERN. Main feature of this STM is the Transa
Hi All,
Almost 4 years ago I developed STM with semantic concurrency control for my
project at CERN. Main feature of this STM is the TransactionalMap that lets
you merge concurrent changes. Library is heavily tested and is very stable.
It has been used in production for the past 2 years.
Recently
Le 18 août 2013 06:00, "Alexandr Kurilin" a écrit :
>
> My thought process was that at this point I have a pure API that either
gets the right inputs or it simply does nothing. As in, no helping messages
about what went wrong, no attempt to do recovery. Some claim that for
security purposes errors
34 matches
Mail list logo
