What about the --output_wrapper part?
My clojurescript js never calls the minified foreign library directly: What
I have is [1] some plain non-optimized javascript that calls [2] CodeMirror
for the code and position, then calls [3] my clojurescript js to find out
how to do the requested paredi
It works for Oracle because they have the $$$ to support it. You just confirmed
that we are on the same wavelength, they have the weapons to nail anyone who
would like to exercise exclusive rights on some contribution made under their CA
even if that individual lives in Kazakhstan.
They have the i
Google also has something similiar, and it has probably been checked by an
army of layers.
http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 2:25:36 AM UTC+2, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Michael Klishin
> >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2012/10/7 Softaddi
On Oct 6, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>
> 2012/10/7 Softaddicts
>> The validity of a scanned signature or electronic keys is subject to
>> interpretation
>> and assessment on a per case basis especially in civil contracts by the
>> diverse
>> legal systems on Earth.
>>
>> It'
For documentation purposes, I think it could be relaxed but it would still need
some reviewing process. The main concern here's is to avoid cloning other
published
stuff with legal rights either intentionally or not.
Luc P.
> It would be nice if there were an alternative to the CA for small
It would be nice if there were an alternative to the CA for small
documentation contributions.
Wikipedia is largely built up from a small pool of dedicated people but
many valuable contributions come from small anonymous edits.
On Saturday, 6 October 2012 18:22:32 UTC-5, Luc wrote:
>
>
> The v
The validity of a scanned signature or electronic keys is subject to
interpretation
and assessment on a per case basis especially in civil contracts by the diverse
legal systems on Earth.
It's not the Clojure community that is behind, it's the legal systems of many
countries
that did not follow
On Oct 6, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Jay Fields wrote:
> The CA process isn't what stops me from contributing, the post a patch
> to Jira is what seems broken to me. I don't even remember how to
> create a patch. Clojure is on github - we live in a fork & pull
> request world, it's time for Clojure to ge
Hi Dave,
This is a metric ton of awesome; thank you very much for taking the time and
effort to put all this together. And, BTW, based on what I've seen so far, I
never would have thought you were new to Clojure. :-)
cont'd…
On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Dave Della Costa wrote:
> I think Chas
On Friday, October 5, 2012 7:17:50 PM UTC+2, Ben wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Transitivity means that for all x,
> y, and z, (Fxy & Fyz) => Fxz. But there are values of x, y, and z for
> which that does not hold.
>
Yeah, sorry. What I meant was that == is only commutative if
I would agree that the CA pain is overemphasized if the submitter lives in the
USA or Canada. It isn't difficult at all.
I have since heard that to get a letter from Russia to the USA, there are
several methods, but they range from
inexpensive-but-can-take-months-and-are-unreliable, to
quick-
I don't always remember how to create a patch, either, but I do remember where
to go to get the short instructions to do so in case I forget. In case you are
curious, the process for creating a patch is documented here, under the heading
"Developing and submitting patches to Clojure and Clojure
I do not agree at all with you. Any piece of software that gets used widely
needs to be maintained with some formal process otherwise there's no way
to insure consistency of future releases. It gets worse as you increase
the # of people that can modify code.
Tickets may seem to you as overhead but
Sorry Michael, I was mistaken about it being Compojure, this is
obviously all lein-ring territory (see in particular, "Starting a web
server"):
https://github.com/weavejester/lein-ring
(12/10/07 2:57), Michael Klishin wrote:
2012/10/6 Dave Della Costa mailto:ddellaco...@gmail.com>>
And s
On Saturday, October 6, 2012 12:03:00 PM UTC-4, Jay Fields wrote:
>
> I once noticed that a Clojure fn didn't have a type hint on a return
> value. Adding ^String made a substantial performance difference. Not
> knowing the process, I forked, and did a pull request. I got this
> response:
>
>
Ah, right. Again, something I'm making assumptions about that maybe I
shouldn't be.
I use 'lein ring server-headless' to run the app, and it always shows up
on port 3000. I believe this is a part of Compojure, but I have to
admit I'm not positive--it shows up in the Compojure docs here (minu
Thanks Shantanu! Yeah, I'll ping Chas Emerick to see what he thinks if
he doesn't tune in on this thread.
(12/10/07 2:25), Shantanu Kumar wrote:
This is fantastic documentation and Michael's feedback is apt and
valuable. I think resources like this should be linked-to from the
Friend README (o
Michael, this is great feedback.
> This tutorial is missing the crucial first step: explaining how to
> add Friend as a dependency with Leiningen
> (and Maven).
So, part of me had thought that these details would covered by looking
through the source of the repo, but on consideration, I think y
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> David, please do not apologize… your contributions to clojurescript have
> been invaluable, and the last time I checked you still have a full-time job
> with that village-newspaper somewhere on the East coast...
>
> My current efforts are
David, please do not apologize… your contributions to clojurescript have been
invaluable, and the last time I checked you still have a full-time job with
that village-newspaper somewhere on the East coast...
My current efforts are to help improve the clojurescript help facilities. I
have workin
This is fantastic documentation and Michael's feedback is apt and
valuable. I think resources like this should be linked-to from the
Friend README (or an appropriate documentation site, e.g. CDS) to
collect such pointers in one place.
Shantanu
On Oct 6, 10:02 pm, Michael Klishin
wrote:
> 2012/10
Hi,
I am curious about the rationale for the mandatory arguments for ->
and ->> macros.
user=> (doc ->)
-
clojure.core/->
([x] [x form] [x form & more])
user=> (doc ->>)
-
clojure.core/->>
([x form] [x form & more])
For -> a form is optional, but
The CA process isn't what stops me from contributing, the post a patch
to Jira is what seems broken to me. I don't even remember how to
create a patch. Clojure is on github - we live in a fork & pull
request world, it's time for Clojure to get on board with that.
I once noticed that a Clojure fn d
Hi folks,
I've been pretty slack in communicating via the mailing list, but I
realized today that there is a lot of important dialogue going on here
so I have to make more of an effort to take part--I want to be a part of
this community!
In any case, I've been using Friend a lot lately, since I c
This insistence on the so-called "CA pain" seems to me overemphasized.
It's a one shot process.
Even if it takes 4 weeks for the paper to reach its destination, it does not
prevent anyone from starting to work on some contribution. The CA
needs to be in by the time the work is about to get publis
Sorry about the reflect stuff is quite new and in need of work. The reflect
support should work through whatever port browser REPL was setup on.
On Saturday, October 6, 2012, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> Ok - I managed to get clojure.reflect/doc to work if the browser loads the
> javascript from the
+1 to lowering the barrier to entry for contributing to the community.
One of the much lauded features of Git is that it can be used to create a
"network of trust". In principle this means you can open your repo up to
anyone, but by being choosy about the pull requests you accept you can
contro
27 matches
Mail list logo
