Benny Tsai writes:
> There's "while" in clojure.core; would that work?
That would be cheating:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
user> (macroexpand '(while (foo) (bar)))
(loop* [] (clojure.core/when (foo) (bar) (recur)))
--8<---cut here---
There's "while" in clojure.core; would that work?
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:13:24 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing your blog post. Is there an Anti-If alternative to
> loop/recur in a situation where you have to poll for a condition to be
> true? (Seems to me that this necessitate
On May 29, 9:54 am, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Is there a way to write something like:
>
> (let [x (foo1 (fn [] (bar y)))
> y (foo2 x)] )
>
> where the y on line 1 refers to y in line 2?
>
> I currently use an atom and an affectation to "tie the loop"...
I agree with the othe
banseljaj writes:
> I don't like to reboot eithere, but you can run this into a VM.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't want to start a VM to do clojure (or
whatever) programming. I mean, a Live CD with a properly set up clojure
environment could be valuable for trying out clojure, but for real
wor
"nicolas.o...@gmail.com" writes:
Hi Nicolas,
> Is there a way to write something like:
>
> (let [x (foo1 (fn [] (bar y)))
> y (foo2 x)] )
>
> where the y on line 1 refers to y in line 2?
You can define mutual recursive local functions using `letfn`, if that's
what you are trying t
Quartzite [1] is a Clojure DSL on top of the Quartz scheduler. It has a few
convenience features
in addition, but primarily tries to make core Quartz features as easy to use as
possible without heavy
use of Java interop in your apps.
Here's a list of what you get out of the box:
* Ability to d
+1, although maybe we are going OT.
With the derivate Lucid Puppy you can also reuse and install existing .deb
packages.
On Sunday, May 27, 2012, James Jeffries wrote:
> It might be worth looking into Puppy Linux. It is quite easy to make a
> derivative of of it and the community around it (forum
letfn allows mutually recursive definitions. You could combine that with
trampoline.
Phil
Sent using thumbs, apologies for brevity
On May 29, 2012 6:54 PM, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is there a way to write something like:
>
> (let [x (foo1 (fn [] (bar y)))
> y (foo2
I too am in Vienna. I use Clojure at work for a few small internal
tools, but not in production. I'd be glad to meet some other
Clojurists.
// Ben
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Nuno Marques
wrote:
> I'm in Vienna and I know a couple of more Clojure people here.
> I would be happy to help star
Dear all,
Is there a way to write something like:
(let [x (foo1 (fn [] (bar y)))
y (foo2 x)] )
where the y on line 1 refers to y in line 2?
I currently use an atom and an affectation to "tie the loop"...
Best,
Nicolas.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Evan Mezeske wrote:
> I'm not really sure what environment variables have to do with the problem.
Leiningen used to check the $CLASSPATH variable, but I don't think
anyone had ever used that on purpose; it just caused problems in
practice. Going forward (2.0.0-pre
Thanks for sharing your blog post. Is there an Anti-If alternative to
loop/recur in a situation where you have to poll for a condition to be
true? (Seems to me that this necessitates some kind of conditional
statement)
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:57:47 AM UTC-4, Dominikus wrote:
>
> Three weeks
I'm in Vienna and I know a couple of more Clojure people here.
I would be happy to help start a clojure group here.
On May 29, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Florian Over wrote:
> Hi
> i met a nice guy (David from intermaps.com) from Vienna on EuroClojure.
> He mentioned that there are other Clojure-User in V
Hi
i met a nice guy (David from intermaps.com) from Vienna on EuroClojure.
He mentioned that there are other Clojure-User in Vienna as well.
But no UserGroup right now.
Maybe you can start irc clojure-at ?
Florian
2012/5/29 Jozef Wagner :
> Hi,
>
> Are there some Clojurians from Austria or is th
Hi,
Are there some Clojurians from Austria or is there an Austria Clojure
group?
I'm looking for a Clojure related job in Austria, and so far I haven't
found any Austrian group on meetup.com nor on the google groups :(
Best,
Jozef
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Great feedback, Christophe. I will get back to you with a better implementation.
Regards,
BG
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Christophe Grand wrote:
> The expansion idea is interesting: expand your selectors to a seq of paths,
> redcue with get-in/assoc-in over thme to get the "extract" sense,
The expansion idea is interesting: expand your selectors to a seq of paths,
redcue with get-in/assoc-in over thme to get the "extract" sense, reduce
with update-in+dissoc to get the exclude. Could yield a nice implementation.
And now for some nitpicking:
* nowadays I'm reluctant to extend a protoc
Christophe,
> Laurent dragged me in the conversation so here is my take
> https://gist.github.com/2823916 which strictly follows your proposed
> "syntax".
I am glad that Laurent dragged you in, I got to see your beautiful solution :-)
Here is my (less beautiful) solution, `extract` along with it
Hi BG,
Laurent dragged me in the conversation so here is my take
https://gist.github.com/2823916 which strictly follows your proposed
"syntax".
hth,
Christophe
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem wherein I need to select subsets of a given map;
Hi Sam,-
I've got everything working now (Swank, Slime, the lein2 command).
Many thanks for your comments. I'll get back to you if I have more
feedback on Emacs Live.
Cheers,
James
On May 28, 10:58 pm, Sam Aaron wrote:
> On Monday, 28 May 2012 at 17:59, James wrote:
> > Regarding Slime and Swan
No, core.logic is not the answer here; numerical stuff is currently out of
reach.
On Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:25:22 UTC+1, jlk wrote:
>
> Hi Zack
>
> I don't really know enough about core.logic to comment on this. Brent
> mentions symbolic math and it sounds neat but I'm more interested in
> n
I'm preparing an informal presentation about clojure concurrency and my
plan is use the ant colony demo. Given the amount of changes in clojure
since the time that code was written I wonder if the code is still
idiomatic or parts of it should be adapted to modern clojure.
Any ideas would be muc
22 matches
Mail list logo
