letfn allows mutually recursive definitions. You could combine that with trampoline.
Phil Sent using thumbs, apologies for brevity On May 29, 2012 6:54 PM, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Is there a way to write something like: > > (let [x (foo1 (fn [] (bar y))) > y (foo2 x)] ....) > > where the y on line 1 refers to y in line 2? > > I currently use an atom and an affectation to "tie the loop"... > > Best, > > Nicolas. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
