On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Timothy Washington wrote:
> Good on you. I've been looking to find a reliable way to have Javascript
> unit testing run in a v8 (or any JS) shell. I've tried Jasmine and am now
> trying Google Closure's unit testing framework, but have so far come up
> short.
>
>
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Scott Jaderholm wrote:
> I haven't read the code yet but I have a few questions:
> Do you miss backbone.js? Are you going to use it with cljs?
>
I'm using 100% ClojureScript, with Google Closure as the only external
dependency. I don't miss Backbone.js, because i
> I've gotten into these over the last week, and I've got to say, Chris is
> doing a very nice job on these frameworks. They are really turning into a
> nicely integrated offering to develop Clojure and ClojureScript web apps.
So...I've been wanting to get into using Cljs recently for a project
I
> i would love to read other community-member's opinion
> on pinot noir ...
I've gotten into these over the last week, and I've got to say, Chris is
doing a very nice job on these frameworks. They are really turning into a
nicely integrated offering to develop Clojure and ClojureScript web apps.
Good on you. I've been looking to find a reliable way to have Javascript
unit testing run in a v8 (or any JS) shell. I've tried Jasmine and am now
trying Google Closure's unit testing framework, but have so far come up
short.
Have you come up with anything that works? For now, i'm just having the
For what it may be worth to you:
In trying out the Noir framework (which neatly assembles
ring+compojure+hiccup+other stuff) for its new bindings to ClojureScript
(using noir-cljs and pivot), I thought some people might like to see what
kind of diff is needed to add basic ClojureScript support
What is the best way to pass Clojure vectors and maps to JavaScript
functions?
Currently when I need to call a JavaScript function that takes an
array I do something like
(js/my_js_fn (.array (vector 1 2 3)))
and I pass Clojure maps like
(js/my_js_fn (.strobj (hash-map "a" 1 "b" 2)))
T
Or, more accurately, not whitelisted, on App Engine.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Mark Rathwell
> wrote:
> > The lib B function uses blacklisted Java classes, ...
>
> "Blacklisted"???
>
> --
> Protege: What is this seething mass of parent
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Mark Rathwell wrote:
> The lib B function uses blacklisted Java classes, ...
"Blacklisted"???
--
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a langua
Thank you both for the help.
>If it's really this serious of an issue, then perhaps the
>makers of the libraries will at least accept a patch from you that
>adds a hook that will swap out parts of the libraries.
Not a serious issue by any means, but I will see what the sentiment is with
the libra
> My code calls a function in 3rd party library A, which in turn calls a
> function in 3rd party library B. The lib B function uses blacklisted Java
> classes, causing my app to crash when lib A calls it. I would like to
> replace that function with a safe version, so that lib A is forced to use
I haven't read the code yet but I have a few questions:
Do you miss backbone.js? Are you going to use it with cljs?
Have you shared any code between the frontend and backend? As in run the
same functions on both sides. If so, are you duplicating the code in both
.clj and .cljs or doing something el
>Yes. The compiler probably optimized away the var lookup to an
>embedded constant. You'll need to use an atom, as Baldridge suggested.
My code calls a function in 3rd party library A, which in turn calls a
function in 3rd party library B. The lib B function uses blacklisted Java
classes, causing
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Mark Rathwell wrote:
>> alter-var-root
> It is still somehow using the original binding. I am trying change the
> binding from aot compiled code, would that change anything?
Yes. The compiler probably optimized away the var lookup to an
embedded constant. You'll
> alter-var-root
It is still somehow using the original binding. I am trying change the
binding from aot compiled code, would that change anything?
> Even if you can, I don't think you want to.
I agree, I don't want to, however, I am trying to get multiple third party
libraries to play together
I think I found a small bug in clojure.core/bases. Extending the
existing unit test reveals it:
(deftest test-bases
(are [x y] (= x y)
(bases java.lang.Math)
(list java.lang.Object)
(bases java.lang.Integer)
(list java.lang.Number java.lang.Comparable) )
(is (seq?
> Is what I am trying to do possible?
Even if you can, I don't think you want to. This sort of thing would
basically remove the immutable nature of Clojure. Instead I would
recommend using a atom...
Timothy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" g
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Mark Rathwell wrote:
> Is what I am trying to do possible?
alter-var-root
Handle with care.
--
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a languag
There is a function in a library I am using that I want to have rebound to a
function of mine for all threads, and can't seem to figure this out, or if
it is even possible. binding, push-thread-bindings, in-ns with def, etc.
are not working, seemingly because they are only rebinding for the curren
See also David Nolan's post:
http://dosync.posterous.com/lispers-know-the-value-of-everything-and-the
Justin
On Tuesday, August 9, 2011 6:02:00 PM UTC-4, pmbauer wrote:
>
> For the sieve, if performance matters, clojure's native data structures may
> not be the best choice.
> A mutable array of
:use … :only doesn't have the problems of full :use.
Enhancement ticket and patch for :use … :only welcome. Note it must support
:use … :only only, i.e. :only is required.
Rich
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:01 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> In Clojure, n
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Sam Aaron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to announce the arrival of the newly-born at-at library -
> freshly extracted from Overtone:
>
> https://github.com/overtone/at-at
>
> at-at is an ahead-of-time function scheduler which essentially provides a
> friendly wra
Hi,
I just wanted to announce the arrival of the newly-born at-at library - freshly
extracted from Overtone:
https://github.com/overtone/at-at
at-at is an ahead-of-time function scheduler which essentially provides a
friendly wrapper around Java's ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.
Enjoy!
Sam
---
If anyone is interested, I have a group for talking about Marginalia
and the art of documentation and code reading. Various other topics
will be fair-game (within reason).
Follow this link if you dare: http://groups.google.com/group/marginalia-clj
--
You received this message because you are su
Thanks Shantanu and Daniel.
I am trying to merge some functionality from two different projects, so the
credentials could be stored in properties file or the project.clj file. And
mine is not a leiningen plugin so I parsed the project.clj file.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Thanks Sumil.
Does anyone know what algorithm they are implementing? It looks like a wheel
factorization but I can't tell from lack ofcomments.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups
Hi James,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, James Sofra wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, you can extend the matching to new types but the match is
> 'closed' in the sense that unlike mutimethods you can't add additional
> cases? Is that correct?
>
>
For the 0.1 release, that is correct.
In future rele
Hi David,
Looks really neat!
Just to clarify, you can extend the matching to new types but the match is
'closed' in the sense that unlike mutimethods you can't add additional
cases? Is that correct?
Hope that makes sense,
James Sofra
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Many thanks for adding this feature. Without it the Clojure code would
have been left in the dust.
On Aug 9, 11:46 pm, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Shoeb Bhinderwala <
>
> shoeb.bhinderw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > With these options added the Clojure code runs just about a
> I've tried pprint and found it lacking as it inserts newlines in
> awkward places apart from the medatada/comments issue mentioned.
Are you using pprint with code-dispatch? That tends to work a lot
better, though it will put newlines where it deems fit. This is either
a good thing or a bad thing
30 matches
Mail list logo
