I think I found a small bug in clojure.core/bases. Extending the
existing unit test reveals it:
(deftest test-bases
(are [x y] (= x y)
(bases java.lang.Math)
(list java.lang.Object)
(bases java.lang.Integer)
(list java.lang.Number java.lang.Comparable) )
(is (seq? (bases java.util.List))))
Test output is:
FAIL in (test-bases) (java_interop.clj:143)
expected: (seq? (bases java.util.List))
actual: (not (seq? #<Class[] [Ljava.lang.Class;@363256a5>))
When calling bases on an inteface it returns an array. Should this not
be a seq?
An easy fix though, 'seq' the else part:
(defn bases
"Returns the immediate superclass and direct interfaces of c, if any"
{:added "1.0"
:static true}
[^Class c]
(when c
(let [i (.getInterfaces c)
s (.getSuperclass c)]
(not-empty
(if s (cons s i) (seq i))))))
Should I file a bug, submit a pull request, or is the behavior intended?
Cheers,
Alf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
