Hi Andrei,
I'm the author of the saxon wrapper library at https://github.com/pjt/saxon.
User-defined XPath functions are indeed desirable but I haven't done
anything special in the library to help in implementing them.
What's available by default in Saxon is the ability to call Java
methods. For
Hi, I'm new and just started coding in clojure. Today I tried the
latest slime with swank-clojure.
A slime cvs > 2010-09 have problems interfacing with swank-clojure
(even then 1.3.0) because of a change in the :abort message. I kind of
hack-fixed them, and figured that some of you may find the fi
Hello Rich,
Lazy defn loading commit to 1.3.0-master introduced a bug or breakage.
Clojure 1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user=> (require 'swank.swank)
user=> (swank.commands.basic/connection-info)
ClassNotFoundException swank/commands/basic
$eval695$connection_info__696 java.lang.Class.forName0 (Class.ja
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Solano Gomez wrote:
> On Wed Mar 2 15:44 2011, clj123123 wrote:
> > In a multi thread app, is there a way to mark a function to be
> > blocking so it can run not simultaneously but would be blocking for
> > each thread?
>
> You could try the locking macro.
Yes, `locking` on the function itself will work; it's roughly equivalent to
a `synchronized` method in Java.
Also try Agents, as Ken suggests.
-Stuart Sierra
clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send em
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Solano Gomez wrote:
> On Wed Mar 2 15:44 2011, clj123123 wrote:
>> In a multi thread app, is there a way to mark a function to be
>> blocking so it can run not simultaneously but would be blocking for
>> each thread?
>
> You could try the locking macro. For
On Wed Mar 2 15:44 2011, clj123123 wrote:
> In a multi thread app, is there a way to mark a function to be
> blocking so it can run not simultaneously but would be blocking for
> each thread?
You could try the locking macro. For this you need an object to lock
on. I suppose you could lock on th
In a multi thread app, is there a way to mark a function to be
blocking so it can run not simultaneously but would be blocking for
each thread?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googl
At the risk of sounding incredibly uneducated about the matter (oh wait,
it's true):
What is the purpose/need/reason for this kind of architecture? What can you
do with it? Where would you use it? Why would you use it?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Ken and Alan,
Thanks for your clarification; point noted.
On Mar 2, 1:14 pm, Alan wrote:
> On Mar 2, 8:36 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Vitaly Peressada
> > wrote:
> > > Ken,
>
> > >> Well for one thing it's printing stuff at macroexpansion time.
It occured to me the other day that it's dead easy to write a safe
"sync-exec" clojure version of SWT's Display/syncExec method.
The idea is to really execute a Display/asyncExec call, but make the calling
thread wait for the asyncExec return value via clojure dataflow feature, aka
promise/deliver
On Mar 2, 8:36 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Vitaly Peressada wrote:
> > Ken,
>
> >> Well for one thing it's printing stuff at macroexpansion time.
>
> > I don't think this the issue. I have tried this in Clojure's REPL and
> > it worked fine
>
> It would work at the REP
(1) I think the copy solution is the easiest. ClojureCLR deals with
its dependencies on the DLR dlls exactly as you describe, with custom
build step to copy DLLs from a lib directory. You will need a project
reference at least to Clojure.dll. You will need the files in
clojure/ subdirectory co
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Vitaly Peressada wrote:
> Ken,
>
>> Well for one thing it's printing stuff at macroexpansion time.
>
> I don't think this the issue. I have tried this in Clojure's REPL and
> it worked fine
It would work at the REPL wrapping a single expression because
macroexpansi
Hi,
Ok. I understand the problem now.
Things work as expected. You get the output in one go, because Vim
waits for the command to complete. There is no polling going on. This
is an intrinsic limitation of Vim. You either have to use something
different like slimv. Or start a Repl in an external c
Hi,
On 2 Mrz., 15:52, Vitaly Peressada wrote:
> I don't think this the issue. I have tried this in Clojure's REPL and
> it worked fine
>
> (defmacro run-with-msg [msg & body]
> (do
> (.write *out* (format "%s..." msg))
> (.flush *out*))
> `(let [res# ~@body]
> (println "d
Ken,
> Well for one thing it's printing stuff at macroexpansion time.
I don't think this the issue. I have tried this in Clojure's REPL and
it worked fine
(defmacro run-with-msg [msg & body]
(do
(.write *out* (format "%s..." msg))
(.flush *out*))
`(let [res# ~@body]
(prin
I guess I should say I'm using Emacs clojure-mode without Slime or swank.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Vitaly Peressada wrote:
> I want to have a way to print progress message before and after
> invoking a function/expression. Came up with this macro
>
> (defmacro run-with-msg [msg & body]
> (doto *out*
> (. write (format "%s..." msg))
> (. flush))
> `(let [res#
It may have to do with whether the environment you are using buffers
Clojure's output. When I run your example code in Emacs, I see this:
user=> (run-with-msg "Working" (Thread/sleep 2000))
Working...
and then 2 seconds later, it looks like this:
user=> (run-with-msg "Working" (Thread/sleep 2
Thanks!
On Mar 2, 5:19 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Alan wrote:
> > '(apply + 1 1) would be how you create a list of those symbols.
>
> Or (list 'apply '+ 1 1) or `(apply + 1 1), both of which allow you to
> put something variable in there, like (list 'apply '+ 1 x) or
I want to have a way to print progress message before and after
invoking a function/expression. Came up with this macro
(defmacro run-with-msg [msg & body]
(doto *out*
(. write (format "%s..." msg))
(. flush))
`(let [res# ~@body]
(println "done")
res#))
user=> (run-with-msg "Worki
Thanks, Guys, for all your help.
Here is an update on where I have got to :
I've given up no trying to aspect the DynamicClassLoader for a while
(maybe forever) as spring/aspecjt/load-time-weaving does not seem to
work at the repl - I've posted another thread regarding this - no
answers as yet.
If I understand their original purpose, the various int-named math ops
will be obivated once the patch to CLJ-445 is applied.
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-445
On Feb 27, 9:04 am, Joost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that in 1.3 alpha 4, unchecked-divide (which seemed to
> support lon
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Alan wrote:
> '(apply + 1 1) would be how you create a list of those symbols.
Or (list 'apply '+ 1 1) or `(apply + 1 1), both of which allow you to
put something variable in there, like (list 'apply '+ 1 x) or `(apply
+ 1 ~x).
--
You received this message because
Hi,
It's not clear to me, from the subject of your email nor its content,
whether this is a pure "clojure-maven-plugin" issue, or also related to
Eclipse, and/or related to Counterclockwise.
Cheers,
--
Laurent
2011/3/2 Zlatko Josic
> Hi,
>
> I use eclipse clojure & maven for developing appli
Hi,
I use eclipse clojure & maven for developing applications. I have clojure
maven plugin installed.
I start script with clojure:run goal. The script creates server socket.
After i terminate script from
eclipse the socket is stil alive. When I start script again I got address
already in use error
2011/3/2 Meikel Brandmeyer :
> Hi,
>
> On 2 Mrz., 10:44, Albert Cardona wrote:
>
>> I get:
>>
>> user=> (set! *unchecked-math* true)
>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't change/establish root binding
>> of: *unchecked-math* with set
>>
>> ... with latest clojure from git master branch.
>
> Ho
Hi,
On 2 Mrz., 10:44, Albert Cardona wrote:
> I get:
>
> user=> (set! *unchecked-math* true)
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't change/establish root binding
> of: *unchecked-math* with set
>
> ... with latest clojure from git master branch.
How did you start your Repl? In case it's not C
Jason,
2011/3/1 Jason Wolfe :
>> But I don't know what the plan is if you really do want truncating
>> arithmetic on longs.
>
> On 1.3 alpha 4:
>
> user=> (+ Long/MAX_VALUE Long/MAX_VALUE)
> ArithmeticException integer overflow
> clojure.lang.Numbers.throwIntOverflow (Numbers.java:1581)
>
> user=>
'(apply + 1 1) would be how you create a list of those symbols.
('apply + 1 1) says "call the function 'apply with the arguments of +
1 and 1".
On Mar 1, 8:37 pm, Mark wrote:
> I found the problem:
> ('apply + 1 1)
>
> I understand why this won't work if I tried to eval the list, but I
> don't un
31 matches
Mail list logo
