> This isn't true anymore. All that's needed is to use the Emacs Lisp
> package manager (http://tromey.com/elpa) to grab swank-clojure, and it
> will download all the dependent elisp and precompiled jars. Currently
> that's 2 manual steps, but in Emacs 24 ELPA will be included, so you
> will be abl
This is terrific. Thanks for releasing them! Really looking forward to
taking a look.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, bradford cross
wrote:
> We're really excited about the way the merge has turned out and the rapid
> progress we expect for the next several months!
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12
"balln...@googlemail.com" writes:
> Emacs / clojure-mode:
> You need to install git to pull down the latest sources!
> You need Clojure and Clojure-contrib (usually you cannot dowload
> contrib but have to build it)
> You need to have ant / maven to build contrib
> You need to download Emacs
> Yo
Andreas Pauley writes:
> GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i386-apple-darwin9.5.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0)
> of 2008-09-22 on plume.sr.unh.edu - Aquamacs Distribution 1.5
>
> I deleted the .swank-clojure/ dir in my home directory and tried M-x
> slime again.
> It seems that this error occurs if the download fails
I am unable to view the API docs reliably with firefox 3.0 (I can not
use my scroll wheel with the Clojure API page - it's the only page on
the net that I know of that behaves this way). So I use konqueror to
view the Clojure API docs. I thought it was just my Ubunut 9.04 box so
I wasn't going to m
Just a thought: maybe this is a sign a clearer message should be
placed on the Clojure contributing page. In any case, it can't hurt to
be more clear can it?
FYI I've submitted a couple of small patches to this group and read
the contributors agreement and the SCA FAQ. After going through this
pro
Zach Tellman writes:
> If that's what it takes, great. Someone just needs to define what a
> multi-platform JNI package looks like. I'm willing to go along with
> whatever is decided upon by technomancy et al.
I don't think this is necessarily within the scope of leiningen
itself; it should be
On 5 dec, 20:48, Christopher Wicklein wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'd like to create an instance of a Java class like this:
>
> let [foo (Bar.)]
>
> but, I'd like the type specified by Bar to not be static, e.g. something like
> this:
>
> let [foo (:type params).]
>
> but, I can't seem to get this
On Dec 5, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Christopher Wicklein wrote:
> Greetings!
Hello!
> I'd like to create an instance of a Java class like this:
>
> let [foo (Bar.)]
>
> but, I'd like the type specified by Bar to not be static, e.g. something like
> this:
>
> let [foo (:type params).]
>
> but, I ca
Greetings!
I'd like to create an instance of a Java class like this:
let [foo (Bar.)]
but, I'd like the type specified by Bar to not be static, e.g. something like
this:
let [foo (:type params).]
but, I can't seem to get this to work with any variation of syntax I've tried.
Is this possible
Nice idea, Luc!
Useful details, Jon.
So I'm implementing "(dosync (let [ tr-id (swap! tr-atom inc)]
(transaction-itself) " and then loading transactions in their tr-id's order
in the next release.
Probably with some floating "window" of postponed transactions in order not
to load all the transac
I have the same problem with FF 3.5. I use chrome to get the full doc.
On Dec 3, 2009 12:25 AM, "Sean Devlin" wrote:
Hey, the API page doesn't look right in Firefox 3.5
The cut off around halfway through the page.
I think this also happens in Safari, but I'm not sure right now.
Oh, and IE 6..
Or how to use the continuation monad.
I just posted the latest tutorial here:
http://intensivesystems.net/tutorials/cont_m_web.html
It covers the internals of the continuation-based web framework I
wrote about here:
http://intensivesystems.net/tutorials/web_sessions.html
It's also a really goo
On Dec 5, 7:34 am, John Harrop wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
> > > The problem is that it is an unreasonably high barrier to entry.
> > > There MUST be an electronic-only way (and it must not require a cell
> > > phone, CC#, &c.) if the full potential of this co
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Richard Newman wrote:
> > The problem is that it is an unreasonably high barrier to entry.
> > There MUST be an electronic-only way (and it must not require a cell
> > phone, CC#, &c.) if the full potential of this community is to be
> > unleashed upon clojure-cont
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Luc Préfontaine wrote:
> I was about to say that. There's no need for the id's to be "contiguous",
> only to get them to grow to preserve ordering.
> If you can find a way in your design to increment the atom each time a
> transaction is retried then you would
> p
Hi,
Am 04.12.2009 um 13:33 schrieb John Harrop:
>> Eg. in Germany
>
> I'm not in Germany.
No. You are not. And I am not in the US. So what? This should just be an
example, that legal things are not easy. And local differences in laws should
be taken into account. (Knowing them is too much, bu
Hmm at this point, I think it makes more sense to add vimclojure
in your dev-dependencies, and then running
java -server -Xms256m -Xmx2048m -cp
'src:classes:lib/*' com.martiansoftware.nailgun.NGServer 127.0.0.1 &
I know that the next version of leiningen will likely have some sort
of "run" co
On 4 Dec 2009, at 23:23, Cliff Wells wrote:
> What isn't clear to me is exactly what a piece of paper provides
> that an
> electronic form doesn't (aside from inconvenience). I don't see any
A clear legal status all over the world. A signed statement on paper
is recognized everywhere. The l
19 matches
Mail list logo
