does this mean that writing android application in clojure is
possible? if not, what else needs to be done to make it happen?
On Nov 14, 2:43 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're coming around the other side of the few breaking changes I
> wanted to get done before release 1.0.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 13.11.2008 um 20:40 schrieb Chris Bunch:
>>
>> Hmm, that didn't work for me. That gives the same output as before:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/1b47e5c7598f1375/8f69db0a0a
Awesome. Not sure how I missed that. Thanks.
--Darren
On Nov 13, 5:37 pm, Brian Carper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 5:07 pm, Allen Rohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 3:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Hey folks,
>
> > > Is there a way to get the System.err dir
On Nov 13, 11:20 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While setting ns to clojure.zip, I get the following error:
>
> user=> (ns clojure.zip)
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: replace already refers to:
> #'clojure.zip/replace in namespace: clojure.zip (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
Hello,
While setting ns to clojure.zip, I get the following error:
user=> (ns clojure.zip)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: replace already refers to:
#'clojure.zip/replace in namespace: clojure.zip (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
clojure.zip=>
Is this expected?
Thanks.
Parth
--~--~-~--~~-
On Thursday 13 November 2008 18:15, Chris Turner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created a new framework for defining specifications on functions...
>
> ...
>
> http://www.bitbucket.org/BestFriendChris/clojure-spec/wiki/Home
>
> ...
>
> Thoughts?
What you've done starts to remind me, however tangentially,
Hi all,
I created a new framework for defining specifications on functions...
http://www.bitbucket.org/BestFriendChris/clojure-spec/wiki/Home
An example spec (taken from the main wiki page):
(defspec + ; Shows we are defining a specification for
the + function
([] (= value
On Nov 13, 5:07 pm, Allen Rohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 3:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
>
> > Is there a way to get the System.err directed to the slime-repl
> > clojure buffer instead of (or in addition to) inferior-lisp buffer? I
> > looked through the docs, b
On Nov 7, 3:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Is there a way to get the System.err directed to the slime-repl
> clojure buffer instead of (or in addition to) inferior-lisp buffer? I
> looked through the docs, but I didn't see anything obvious.
>
> Thanks!
> --Darren
I'd also lik
On Nov 13, 1:43 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're coming around the other side of the few breaking changes I
> wanted to get done before release 1.0.
> New regex format:
> Uniform binding syntax using vectors:
> And ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation (SVN 1094+)
Wow, cool! I haven'
Hi,
Am 13.11.2008 um 20:40 schrieb Chris Bunch:
Hmm, that didn't work for me. That gives the same output as before:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/1b47e5c7598f1375/8f69db0a0a7e0564?lnk=gst&q=java+prohibited+namespace#8f69db0a0a7e0564
See also this thread.
Sincere
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just built Clojure and clojure-contrib from source.
>
> I'm getting something odd:
[...]
Try "svn up -r1088".
If you run "svn log -r1087:" you will see that there have been some
changes that might cause certain t
Ah, I see. Thanks guys!
Rich Hickey wrote:
On Nov 13, 2:31 pm, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(clojure.core/ns clojure)
or if you are on an old build I think it would be
(clojure/ns clojure)
This is coming in my book notes, I promise :), but ns should
Hmm, that didn't work for me. That gives the same output as before:
java=> (clojure/ns clojure)
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.SecurityException: Prohibited
package name: java (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
The only way I can get the REPL to return a different message is in the
case of syntax error
On Nov 13, 2:31 pm, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (clojure.core/ns clojure)
>
> or if you are on an old build I think it would be
>
> (clojure/ns clojure)
>
This is coming in my book notes, I promise :), but ns should not be
used to change namespaces in the repl, only in-ns shoul
On Nov 13, 12:43 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're coming around the other side of the few breaking changes I
> wanted to get done before release 1.0.
>
Is there a roadmap published anywhere?
Thanks,
Wilkes
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
(clojure.core/ns clojure)
or if you are on an old build I think it would be
(clojure/ns clojure)
>
> Hi all,
>While playing with the Clojure REPL I changed my namespace to be
> "java" (since I was testing out Java interop stuff) and now when I try
> any commands, I see the following:
>
> ja
Hi all,
While playing with the Clojure REPL I changed my namespace to be
"java" (since I was testing out Java interop stuff) and now when I try
any commands, I see the following:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.SecurityException: Prohibited
package name: java (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
Sinc
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> The clojure.contrib and tools folks are working on getting in sync
> with these changes. For minimal disruption, please stick with the SVN
> rev they support (say, 1088), or lend a hand in testing their patches.
I've updated my contribs and other
Parth Malwankar wrote:
> So for example is it possible to do something like this at
> the end of file:
>
> (when (running-as-script)
> (doseq x (repeatedly #(Thread/sleep 100
I do it with this idiom:
(when *command-line-args*
...)
Check out Script.java for more info.
-Drew
--~-
We're coming around the other side of the few breaking changes I
wanted to get done before release 1.0.
The changes are:
New regex format:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/eddd7f0d292da683
Uniform binding syntax using vectors:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread
On Nov 13, 5:49 pm, Larrytheliquid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm porting RSpec to Clojure and would appreciate any syntax
> recommendations:http://paste.lisp.org/display/70313
This expression is not very 'lispy':
(=> (conj my-vec 1) should = [1])
Perhaps it should be:
(should = (conj my
Hi,
the latest check-ins introduced breaking changes.
Please refer to the commit messages for more
information.
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> When (if ever) is it good form to call the underlying Java APIs used
> by Clojure's special forms?
I was thinking Rich might reply and weigh in on my suggestion to use
an RT method. I'd also like to know if this should be avoided. It
seems like it might be ok, since the var method is publi
I'm porting RSpec to Clojure and would appreciate any syntax
recommendations:
http://paste.lisp.org/display/70313
--
Respectfully,
Larry Diehl
www.larrytheliquid.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Yep, definitely. When I back down to the latest download version it
works correctly.
$ sudo cp ~/Downloads/clojure_20080916/clojure.jar .
Password:
/usr/local/clojure
$ java -cp clojure-contrib.jar:clojure.jar clojure.lang.Repl
Clojure
user=> (use 'clojure.contrib.str-utils)
nil
user=> (str-join
I just built Clojure and clojure-contrib from source.
I'm getting something odd:
$ ls
total 1288
drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 272B Nov 12 12:15 .
drwxr-xr-x 24 root wheel 816B Nov 11 11:53 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226B Nov 11 11:53 clojure-auto.el
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel51K Nov
Some people have asked how to donate to Clojure, so I've turned
donations on in SF:
https://sourceforge.net/project/project_donations.php?group_id=137961
Thanks to all for your support!
Rich
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:35:52 +0100, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
>> [...]
>> becomes:
>>
>> (deftest t-Symbols
>>(check
>> (:equal
>>'abc (symbol "abc")
>>'*+!-_? (symbol "*+!-_?")
>>'abc:def:ghi (symb
--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
> [...]
> becomes:
>
> (deftest t-Symbols
>(check
> (:equal
>'abc (symbol "abc")
>'*+!-_? (symbol "*+!-_?")
>'abc:def:ghi (symbol "abc:def:ghi")
>'abc/def (symbol "abc" "def")
>'abc.def/ghi (symbol "ab
Using this, test t-Symbols
(deftest t-Symbols
(is (= 'abc (symbol "abc")))
(is (= '*+!-_? (symbol "*+!-_?")))
(is (= 'abc:def:ghi (symbol "abc:def:ghi")))
(is (= 'abc/def (symbol "abc" "def")))
(is (= 'abc.def/ghi (symbol "abc.def" "ghi")))
(is (= 'abc/def.ghi (symbol "abc" "def
On Nov 13, 8:36 am, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Meikel,
>
> I spent a few minutes trying to write a macro to do this that doesn't
> use eval. So far no good. Is it truly impossible, though? I have never
> seen a good discussion of "things that can be done only with eval".
> A
Hi Stuart,
> I spent a few minutes trying to write a macro to do this that doesn't
> use eval. So far no good. Is it truly impossible, though? I have never
> seen a good discussion of "things that can be done only with eval".
> Any pointers?
The problem is, that macros happen at compile ti
Hi Meikel,
I spent a few minutes trying to write a macro to do this that doesn't
use eval. So far no good. Is it truly impossible, though? I have never
seen a good discussion of "things that can be done only with eval".
Any pointers?
Cheers,
Stuart
> Hi,
>
> On 13 Nov., 07:27, Larrytheliq
Hi,
On 13 Nov., 07:27, Larrytheliquid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to pass a vector to a function like let, rather than manually
> typing in the brackets?
let is not a function, but a special form (see:
http://clojure.org/special_forms).
It is only possible via eval to achieve th
Is there a way to pass a vector to a function like let, rather than manually
typing in the brackets?
;;; normal let
(let [one 1] one)
;;; list let
(def bindings-list '[one 1])
(list-let bindings-list one)
--
Respectfully,
Larry Diehl
www.larrytheliquid.com
--~--~-~--~~~
On Nov 13, 12:25 pm, notallama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i put this at the end of my boot.clj for added fun:
>
> (defn iterate
> "returns a lazy seq of arg1, arg2 ... argn, (f arg1 ... argn), (f
> arg2 ... argn (f arg1 ... argn)), etc."
> [f & [x & rest :as all]]
> (lazy-cons x (apply i
2008/11/12 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm looking at the Clojure SVN and I'm wondering, where are the unit
> tests?
>
There is test-clojure in clojure-contrib - see the following thread for
details:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/697d59883a273795/bb057
38 matches
Mail list logo
