Here's a first pass at an addition to test_is, the assert-raises
macro. It asserts that the given expression throws an exception of the
specified type.
There are two things I don't like about this implementation: the name
doesn't quite go with the test_is theme, and the (is :a :a) at the
bottom.
On Sep 23, 11:11 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Cool, thanks Rich! This will be fun to play with. One question -- is
> > it possible to get the previous value of the agent (before the action)
> > from within the ca
On Sep 23, 11:11 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 23, 9:50 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I've added some support for agent watches. You should consider it
> > > experimental, but it will
On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sep 23, 9:50 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've added some support for agent watches. You should consider it
> > experimental, but it will allow the creation of cell-like and other
> > reactive systems.
>
> Coo
On Sep 23, 10:47 am, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sep 23, 9:50 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've added some support for agent watches. You should consider it
> > experimental, but it will allow the creation of cell-like and other
> > reactive systems.
>
> Coo
On Sep 23, 9:50 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added some support for agent watches. You should consider it
> experimental, but it will allow the creation of cell-like and other
> reactive systems.
Cool, thanks Rich! This will be fun to play with. One question -- is
it possib
Hi mac,
On Sep 23, 6:42 am, mac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this not mean that if several alter-cell statements execute in
> parallell on the same cell then it is possible that some of the
> functions set in the first send are discarded?
I *think* this shouldn't matter, because only the *l
On Sep 22, 10:55 pm, "Stuart Sierra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ok, here's another version of Cells, attached. This one uses Agents,
> like MikeM wrote. It works even on a 1-link chain of dependencies
> -- see examples in the comment at the end. Cells get updated
> asynchronously via ac
I just started looking at this today, I think it looks very cool.
Can't say I completely understand the code yet because I just read
through it rather quickly.
But I have a question about the alter-cell function in the last
version posted by Stuart:
The last two lines of alter-cell are sends to th
