Hi mac, On Sep 23, 6:42 am, mac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this not mean that if several alter-cell statements execute in > parallell on the same cell then it is possible that some of the > functions set in the first send are discarded?
I *think* this shouldn't matter, because only the *last* call to alter- cell is important. I'm assuming that in normal usage, alter-cell is only called on Cells that hold constant values, not expressions. Cells defined with an expression shouldn't change that often. The code doesn't make this distinction clear. It should probably treat "value cells", which have no dependencies and don't need a fn at all, differently from "expression cells". -Stuart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
