On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Henderson, Brandon J
wrote:
> Any ideas?
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/clamav/
Get pkgutil from OpenCSW, install Clam with "pkgutil -i clamav", done.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Rick Pim wrote:
> Török Edwin writes:
> > This patch might be needed:
> > http://wiki.clamav.net/pub/Main/UpgradeNotes0953/patch-0.95.3-bug1737.diff
>
> i couldn't get it to apply using the default vendor-supplied
> tools -- hence the request for a hint or a patc
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Steve Kirkby wrote:
> I can't get through the tech. complexity of upgrading my ClamAV, version
> 2.2.2. I am not a computer engineer, just a user. On getting the daily
> message in Console that my ClamAV engine is outdated (don't panic), I deleted
> Clam and its
2012/3/6 Török Edwin :
> On 03/06/2012 02:23 PM, shuttlebox wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Steve Kirkby wrote:
>>> I can't get through the tech. complexity of upgrading my ClamAV, version
>>> 2.2.2. I am not a computer engineer, just a user. On g
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Barely on topic but I have a question about RPM's. I'm rolling out an
> enterprise ClamAV solution for PCI compliance and need to use a reliably
> sourced RPM distribution from a third party. I've always done this myself
> but as a contracto
I have problems scanning Powerpoint documents. It takes just a few
seconds to scan the 500 MB df-file containing the document but if I
extract it it takes around 7 minutes to scan the 380 MB document.
I vaguely remember this being discussed before but couldn't find any
relevant posts when going t
On 3/27/07, shuttlebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have problems scanning Powerpoint documents. It takes just a few
seconds to scan the 500 MB df-file containing the document but if I
extract it it takes around 7 minutes to scan the 380 MB document.
I got the sizes mixed up - it shoul
On 3/27/07, aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi shuttlebox,
Thank you for answering.
What's a regular file?
If "regular file" means "not an archive" or "something which doesn't
require processing" then I agree with you. Scanning archives,
On 3/27/07, aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If nothing works than you'll have to disable olescanning completely or
to upgrade your hardware :P
I use Sun Fire X4100M2 servers with dual AMD Opteron 2,6 GHz dual core
CPU:s with 4 GB RAM and HW-RAID SAS drives. What do you suggest I
upgrade to? :-
On 3/28/07, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting shuttlebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/27/07, aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If nothing works than you'll have to disable olescanning completely
> or
> > to upgrade your hardware :P
>
> I use
On 3/28/07, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest you do the following:
o Scan the file manually with the --leave-temps
I have done this now. The 3,8 MB file unpacked in 78 directories (e.g.
clamav-ee4dca88cff9ffa2) and totalled over 500 files!
o Have a look in your tmp dir and see what
On 7/19/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are all the people having problems using --with-experimental perhaps?
>
> Not in our case here. We never built clamav using --with-experimental
Have you tried Blastwaves build? I use that with no problems.
http://www.blastwave.org
--
/pete
On 8/16/07, rick pim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i have one gateway machine running clamav; it's a running solaris
> 5.9 on sparc hardware. every couple of years i upgrade it to a
> new box (well, since i use cast-off hardware for it, a new old
> box, but you know what i mean) with up to date OS
On 9/1/07, Paul McEwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was originally running ClamAV (v0.90.3) and using the milter with
> Sendmail. It worked great, and then I installed MailScanner. It continued to
> function fine, but then I tried to upgrade to v0.91.1
>
> I used the rpm packages with the -U opti
On 9/12/07, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie)
>
> See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at
> all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago.
+1
--
/peter
___
Help us
On 10/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - I'm new here and request some help! :)
>
> I'm running Ubuntu 7.10 with Clamav (Clamd) version 0.91.2 build 4610.
> I'm running Clamav mainly as a virus scanner for Exim.
>
> When I reboot the machine, the directory /var/run/clamav di
On Nov 15, 2007 1:22 PM, David F. Skoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
> > Oh, but wait. What's going on here? You upgrade ClamAV and your
> > configuration changes? That shouldn't happen at all. Are you using an
> > installer tool that overwrites your deployed configuration? Sur
On Dec 21, 2007 3:25 AM, j t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm trying to track down a performance issue that I get using clamwin,
> and I've traced the problem back to clamav (I've tested clamav's
> current subversion on my Debian Etch box).
>
> On my Thinkpad T60, I can run clamscan aga
On Jan 12, 2008 5:09 PM, Daniel Garcia Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that the files in /var/tmp/clamav-* are growing
> rapidly, and even after deletion, the link count does not decrease,
> until it arrives to 32767 wich fires errno EMLINK: too many links ...
> and clamdscan/clam
On Jan 18, 2008 10:18 PM, Joey McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installing new version of clamav over clamav0.91.2 when i get to the make
> install step i get this error message:
>
> /usr/bin/install: cannot remove '/usr/sbin/clamd': Permission Denied.
It's OK to be a normal user when doin
On Feb 12, 2008 3:14 PM, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote:
>
> > Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave?
> >
> > http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav
>
> Wow, this is a switch -- d
On Feb 12, 2008 1:43 PM, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Randal, Phil wrote:
>
> > clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92
> >
> > # clamscan --version
> > ClamAV 0.92.1
>
> I seem to have a bigger problem:
>
> [castor]:~/apps/mail/clamav-0
On Feb 12, 2008 12:55 PM, Jonathan Armitage
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just compiled ClamAV 0.92.1 on one of our mail servers, a Sun X2100 M2
> with an AMD chip, and also on my test machine, an old Dell with a Pentium
> chip.
> Both machines are running Solaris 10.
>
> In both cases I spo
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Alonso, Claudio Fabian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'd like to know if you are planning to include in the download page a
> complied version of clamav-0.92.1 for Solaris 8 as you did for previous
> versions.
If you want a current binary Clam pac
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run clamd on a CentOS server, with freshclam, and clamsmtpd to scan mail.
> And I use it interfacing with postfix.
> However, just clamd alone uses 23 Megabytes when idle!
23 MB is huge? What are you running it on, a Commodore 6
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Syed Fawaz Hasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. I did that and the installation seems to have gone fine.
> However, where do you think clamav is installed? It is not in /usr/bin. How
> can I run clamav and sigtool?
# which clamscan
If that doesn't work:
#
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Laurent POUJOULAT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had massive false positives today on our Redhat file server:
> Trojan.Downloader-41859 on several windows executable files. All concerned
> files are windows setup files. These files have been cross-checked
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Don Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am following step by step the installation of clam av and am on this
> page:
> http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/html/node11.html
>
> I am assuming that I had to rpm -Uvh the package first but after that
> there is no
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Don Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/html/node11.html
> The top instructions tell you to create in the home directory for
> unprivileged accounts, then the instructions to test below are asking
> you to run from root which ultima
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:22 PM, James Kosin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
>>
>> > X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tad.clamav.net
>>
>> just found this in the headers of this mailing list :(
>>
>>
> Don't be surprised. I often use products I create
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a point to this thread?
Not really, it started out weird and we just went from there. :-)
/peter
--
Emo Philips - "I got some new underwear the other day. Well, new to me."
__
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this not a problem with Sparc processors, then? I've not witnessed it
> at all on my systems.
Me neither, I have clamd running on several Solaris 10 servers for
months staying at 70 MB. When I heard of excessive memor
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Tomi Hakala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> clamd process on my Solaris 10 x86 box grows up to 2 GB just in few days,
> this seems a bit excessive for me. At first clamd was compiled in 32 bit
> mode with gcc but few days back I compiled it in 64 bit just to
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Madhuri Somavarapu
wrote:
> In my error log while starting clamd svc on Unix I see these
>
> clamd: Configuration file has not been customised.
> freshclam: Configuration file has not been customised.
> [ Feb 3 14:02:12 Method "start" exited with status 0 ]
> [ Fe
I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11:
source='netcode.c' object='netcode.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \
/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I.. -I/opt
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-03-01 00:08, shuttlebox wrote:
>> I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11:
>
> Please open a bugreport about this, and attach your config.log, and
> clamav-config.h.
Done. Bug
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Gary L Burnore wrote:
> However, www.sunfreeware.com has ncurses 5.6 in pkg form
> which is usually installed for other reasons anyway.
And OpenCSW has ncurses 5.7:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/ncurses
--
/peter
__
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
wrote:
>> On a Solaris10/sparc box (UltraSPARC-IIi 440Mhz) it takes 18s.
>
> Hmmm, a T2000 is "slightly" better than your sparc box (a 10 years old
> Ultra 5 or Ultra 10 ?). But it doesn't seems too faster.
Those T2000's are not that fas
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Updating ncurses involves a lot of regression testing with existing
> applications
> and perhaps rebuilding some or all of then and I don't care to do that until I
> do a server refresh later this year so I'm stuck with 5.4 for now.
Is the
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-03-04 22:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>> Time: 14.949 sec (0 m 14 s)
>>
>> A T2000 with 8 cores looks like this :
>>
>> # psrinfo -v
>> Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 03/04/2009 21:44:58
>> on-line since 01/30/2009 12
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:38 PM, David Jewell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to update my clamav install from 0.93 to 0.94.2 on an
> Ubuntu based server. Running the make && make check I am have been
> meet with a series of errors. Some I have fixed by installing/updating
> some libs but I am stil
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, John Goubeaux
wrote:
> Has anyone done a successful build of clamAV-0.95 0n Solaris 10 x86 ?
Feel free to use OpenCSW packages, we have ClamAV 0.95 for Solaris
8/9/10 on x86/sparc.
http://opencsw.org/packages/clamav
All dependencies are handled automatically wi
On 1/5/06, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the "innocent bystander" analogy.
> >
> > Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his head
> > shaved and "Fight the Power" tattoos hands you a ticking package with
> > grease stai
On 2/20/06, Robert Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting the following message in my maillog file.
>
> Feb 20 01:04:57 as ClamAV-autoupdate[6774]: ClamAV updater
> /usr/bin/clamdscan/bin/freshclam cannot be run
>
Look in /etc/MailScanner/virus.scanners.conf and check that the pa
On 2/20/06, Robert Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got the following in my /etc/MailScanner/virus.scanners.conf file
>
> clamav /usr/lib/MailScanner/clamav-wrapper
> /usr/bin/clamdscan
>
> Are there two commands here getting concastinated ?
>
> i.e /usr/bin/clamdscan and
On 2/23/06, Lee Yip Fei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That would be too troublesome as there are many accounts in the server.
> Hopefully clamav with have this feature in future. Do there have any plan on
> this now?
>
Have you looked at projects like MailScanner? It integrates tools like
SpamAss
On 3/27/06, Rolf E. Sonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during installation of ClamAV 0.88 (the package from Citrus,
> http://www.citrus-it.co.uk/clamav//) on a Solaris 10 system I get the
> following warnings:
Have you considered using www.blastwave.org? It will handle dependencies nic
On 3/28/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At 11:24 AM 3/27/2006, René Berber wrote:
> >> Like Andy and the citrus site says:
> >>
> >> "The following binary packages of ClamAV are for Solaris 9 SPARC
> >> 64-bit."
> >>
> >> So, don't install those on S
48 matches
Mail list logo
