Hello,
I use an old PC as a gateway at home ; with mail and web proxies using the
clamAV socket. This machine only has 128MB of RAM. It worked very well until
I install the 0.96 version (and more recently the 0.96.1 one). First of all,
the startup takes more time ; it's not really a big problem si
2010/6/8 Török Edwin
> On 06/08/2010 02:14 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use an old PC as a gateway at home ; with mail and web proxies using
> the
> > clamAV socket. This machine only has 128MB of RAM. It worked very well
> until
> > I inst
a problem ; during the reload process, I can't browse ; as
clamd is occupied to reload, it can't scan the streams. How could I do to
still use it while it's reloading ?
2010/6/8 Török Edwin
> On 06/08/2010 07:54 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > 2010/6/8 Török Edwin
> >
2010/6/10 Török Edwin
> On 06/09/2010 11:34 AM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > I tried to renice clamd with a priority of 19. It doesn't change the
> > behaviour of scanning while I'm browsing, and the reload process doesn't
> > take more time ; I'd even say it&#
Thank you for the patch. I applied it, the force-reload seems to be (really)
faster. I'll tell you if I see changes on selfchecks.
2010/6/10 Török Edwin
> On 06/10/2010 12:30 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > What exactly do you mean by reload ? The fact is that I can't browse
>
Actually, I'm not sure of what I did ; I couldn't apply the patch with
"patch", and I made the changes manually ; but it seems that all the free()
are in the #if 0 block.
What is exactly your patch supposed to do ?
2010/6/10 Vivien Raoul
> Thank you for the patch. I appli
2010/6/10 Török Edwin
> On 2010-06-10 21:29, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > Actually, I'm not sure of what I did ; I couldn't apply the patch with
> > "patch", and I made the changes manually ; but it seems that all the
> free()
> > are in the #if 0 block.
&
mory usage : how
could I do to make clamd use more RAM than it does now ?
2010/6/10 Török Edwin
> On 2010-06-10 22:29, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > 2010/6/10 Török Edwin
> >
> >> On 2010-06-10 21:29, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> >>> Actually, I'm not sure of what I
I will try it and I'll tell you. About RAM, I didn't explain well. I meant,
how to do to make clamav use more RAM than swap ; i.e. how to reserve RAM to
clamav in order to avoid swap.
2010/6/16 Török Edwin
> On 06/16/2010 07:47 PM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > I retried to ap
I probably didn't mention it, indeed ; the OS I use is Debian. And I can't
add RAM in any way. It worked perfectly with the former version, that's why
I asked this question here.
Regards.
2010/6/16 Chuck Swiger
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Vivien Raoul wrote:
> > I w
Hello,
I used to post here a few months ago about the engine's memory consumption.
The newer versions give me satisfaction, but during the process of database
reload (after a freshclam update), the network can be unreachable during a
few minutes.
To explain the situation quickly, I use a gateway u
To answer to your questions, I use 0.97 too, and yes I am the one with the
128MB gateway. Concerning my first question, I disabled the mempool ; I
should then have no problem having 2 databases at the same time. Do you
think the functionality of asynchronous database reload could be added in
the fu
12 matches
Mail list logo
