Re: [Clamav-users] How to download souce from the linux command line using WGET?

Ken Morley wrote: I have a Linux (CentOS) server and I need to download the latest ClamAV stable source. The server doesn't have a web browser, so I need to use a command line to download the source. I've read the FAQ's and ClamAV documentation, but don't find instructions for using wget or oth

Re: [Clamav-users] How to download souce from the linux command line using WGET?

Nigel Frankcom wrote: On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:22:33 +0100, Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Morley wrote: I have a Linux (CentOS) server and I need to download the latest ClamAV stable source. The server doesn't have a web browser, so I need to use a command line to d

Re: [Clamav-users] How to make ClamAV scan incoming email received by qmail on Plesk

Dennis Peterson wrote: fcgmail wrote: And also if it's made to work with qmail, how can i make it not to scan outgoing email? Any hint will be greatly appreciated! If you checked your outgoing mail I wouldn't have to check it when it gets to my server. The only reason I have to check oth

[Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

Hi! Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, which might although have other shortcomings in terms of Mailscanner not knowing if it is running. The patch provided on the clamav-devel list seems to improve things,

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

René Berber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Michael Heiming wrote: > > | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running > | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, > > It is trivial, just change l

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

Michael Heiming wrote: > René Berber wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Michael Heiming wrote: >> >> | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running >> | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch t

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

Randal, Phil wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Michael Heiming wrote: >>> René Berber wrote: >>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> Michael Heiming wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tests

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

Michael Heiming wrote: > Michael Heiming wrote: >> René Berber wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Michael Heiming wrote: >>> >>> | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Ru

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2 (solved)

René Berber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Michael Heiming wrote: > > | clamav-wrapper is the same file from the latest MS, the SweepViruses.pm > | patched applied cleanly after editing out some garbled text. So I gues > | it is just

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan delays

Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200 > Urban Hillebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have >> reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - >> however, on our mailgateways clamscan is sti

[Clamav-users] Oversized.zip in 0.90 handling?

Hi! Got the famous Oversized.zip error which wasn't seen so far ( with 0.88.7) running Mailscanner which uses clamscan not clamd. From CLI I gather the following (0.90) ; clamscan --max-ratio=100 --unzip HU_Log.zip /tmp/test.zip: Oversized.Zip FOUND --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known

Re: [Clamav-users] Oversized.zip in 0.90 handling? (solved)

Michael Heiming wrote: Hi! Got the famous Oversized.zip error which wasn't seen so far ( with 0.88.7) running Mailscanner which uses clamscan not clamd. From CLI I gather the following (0.90) ; clamscan --max-ratio=100 --unzip HU_Log.zip /tmp/test.zip: Oversized.Zip FOUND ---