Hi,
using OpenBSD3.3 clamd is not logging to syslog allthough configured in
clamav.conf (LogSyslog). Logging to file works fine.
Thanks, Helmut
Mon Dec 29 19:42:04 2003 -> +++ Started at Mon Dec 29 19:42:04 2003
Mon Dec 29 19:42:04 2003 -> Log file size limit disabled.
Mon Dec 29 19:42:04 2003 -
Hi Thomasz,
> > using OpenBSD3.3 clamd is not logging to syslog allthough configured
> > in clamav.conf (LogSyslog). Logging to file works fine.
>
> Please try to run with root privileges - the problem may be connected
> with your security settings.
Still not logging although running as root (sho
Hi,
I used to use http://activeintra.net/projects/clamav/openbsd/ but it does not seem to
be updated anymore. Does anyone have a port for OpenBSD33 for clamav > 0.65?
Thanks, Helmut
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
TECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Helmut
Schneider
Envoyé : mercredi 18 février 2004 09:45
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Clamav-users] OpenBSD Port
Hi,
I used to use http://activeintra.net/projects/clamav/openbsd/ but it does
not seem to be updated anymore. Does anyone have a
Hi,
seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files (e.g. Bagle.N):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# /usr/local/bin/clamscan ./first_part.rar
./first_part.rar: RAR module failure.
./first_part.rar: OK
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 20477
Scanned directories: 0
Scanne
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files (e.g.
> Bagle.N):
To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but clamav does not recognize the
virus within the archive (maybe a DB problem)...
Please do not feed my mailbox, Swen alrea
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>>> seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files
>>> (e.g.
>>> Bagle.N):
>>
>> To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but clamav does
>> not recogni
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in the
>> original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>>
> Aaah :)
>
> In that case,
> test the original mail (not just the attachmen
Lynn Duerksen wrote:
>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in
>> the original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>
> I am experiencing similar problems on my OpenBSD 3.4 box and was
> wondering if there has been any resolution on this issue.
I'm using 3.4, too.
--
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Lynn Duerksen wrote:
>
>>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in
>>> the original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>>
>> I am experiencing similar problems on my OpenBSD 3.4 box and was
>> won
Hi,
I recently noticed a mail problem and after crawling the logfiles I saw that
one of the "performance killers" is clamd(scan). I have a (e.g.) PPT file
with a size of 10M and clamdscan takes about 90 seconds to scan it. If I put
the file to a ramdisk (OpenBSD, P4 2GHz, 1G of RAM) it still t
Christopher X. Candreva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I don't want to discuss about performance in general, I would just
like to know if this is "normal" and/or if there is a way to tune up
that process.
I use 0.88.7
Yes, it is no
Christopher X. Candreva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performance.
OK. Could you define "greatly improved"? I'm quite happy with clamav
but I use postfix/amavis with pre-queueing and therefo
13 matches
Mail list logo
