Re: [Clamav-users] Getting "***UNCHECKED***" on some emails I send out.

Le Wed 24/02/2010, Dennis Peterson disait > There are relatively few end points on the Internet that send mail > out without going through an ISP's gateway. I'm not so sure about this. Compaies do not use ISP gateways... -- Erwan ___ Help us build a c

Re: [Clamav-users] No debian woody support anymore?

Message original Sujet: Re: [Clamav-users] No debian woody support anymore? De : Rob Sterenborg Pour : ClamAV users ML Date : Fri Apr 23 2010 09:40:20 GMT+0200 >> OK, how's this then. 9.5.3 (IIRC) came out about the time the notice > > OK, how's this then. If you used freshcla

Re: [Clamav-users] FreshClam claims installation is OUTDATED

Olivier Fauveaux wrote: > Hello all. > > After FreshClam execution, I send an email if output code is not 0. > Output code 2, means that Clamav engine is outdated. > Since Yesterday night, FreshClam returns code 2. > Early morning, I did an update. FresClam still cleaming that > installation is OU

Re: [Clamav-users] block attachment with certain file endings (also in archives)

Le Tue 28/09/2010, Florian Friesdorf disait > Hi, > > I host several mailing list with plenty of users having gmail accounts. > > gmail blocks attachments with certain file endings (also if the files > are in certain archives): > > http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6590 > > I

Re: [Clamav-users] Unable to install ClamAV 96.3.

On 04/10/10 18:25, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 10/4/10 9:20 AM, Al Varnell wrote: >> On 10/4/10 7:51 AM, "Dennis Peterson" wrote: >> >>> On 10/1/10 11:30 PM, Al Varnell wrote: On 10/1/10 12:07 AM, "Dennis Peterson" wrote: > A short term solution until Apple updates bzip2 is to inst

Re: [clamav-users] daily.cvd update issue.

Le Tue 19/07/2011, Jan-Pieter Cornet disait > On 2011 Jul 19, at 17:20 , Luca Gibelli wrote: > > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > > What? If websites are a requirement for ClamAV then this project is doomed. I > don't see our NOC surfin the interwebz as part of the job. > > (Sarcasm alert). W

Re: [clamav-users] Has ClamAV mailing list been leaked?

On 07/07/12 09:26, Jason Haar wrote: > These days, the only "safe" email address is the non-existent one that > is also never used ;-) > Not even that. spammers generate addresses by using left part of an address in other domains... ___ Help us build a

Re: [clamav-users] Differences between Redhat and Debian clamav set up

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen said: > francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14: > > >This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam > >daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron > >do the same? > > if you like to see redhat performs as badly as de

Re: [clamav-users] New Version of ClamAV

Le 20/03/2013 18:42, Robert Lopez a écrit : Bot net member identification and blocking. Block email from spoofed in-our-domain-sender sent from outside our domain when it is equal to one of list of recipients. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Matt Olney wrote: Hey all, We're currently sco

[clamav-users] milter putting mail on HOLD ?

SInce yesteraday I get emails stuck on hold with followng postfix log: milter-hold: END-OF-MESSAGE from unknown[80.150.130.2]: milter triggers HOLD action; My only milter is clamav-milter and I run the combination for several years without problems. At the time the message was put on h

Re: [clamav-users] milter putting mail on HOLD ?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:39:07PM CEST, Matus UHLAR - fantomas said: > On 14.05.13 13:37, Erwan David wrote: > > >SInce yesteraday I get emails stuck on hold with followng postfix log: > > > >milter-hold: END-OF-MESSAGE from unknown[80.150.130.2]: milter triggers HOLD

Re: [Clamav-users] memory leak in clamd (0.91.1)?

Le Mon 13/08/2007, Tomasz Chmielewski disait > Does clamd (0.91.1) have a memory leak of some sort? > > After it's started, it takes just about 40-50 MB: > > clamav 13602 48.0 8.4 47932 45128 ?Ds 10:38 0:01 clamd > -c /etc/clamd.conf > > > After some time, the memory usage goes

Re: [Clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs is dreadfully slow/CPU-intensive

Le Mon 12/11/2007, Tilman Schmidt disait > John Rudd schrieb: > > Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > > >> (Remember the viruses ClamAV checks for > >> are *Windows* viruses. A unixoid OS doesn't run ClamAV for its own > >> protection but for the protection of Windows clients.) > > > > OpenOffice isn't vul

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV with FreeBSD 7

Le Mon 28/04/2008, Richard J. Kieran disait > Has anyone be using ClamAV with FreeBSD 7? Are there any known problems? I > use clamd with MIMEDefang and Sendmail. TIA. > Richard I use clamav with clamsmtp and postfix. No problem at all. -- Erwan ___

Re: [Clamav-users] simplest replacement for ancient amavis-perl

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:20:01PM CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > David F. Skoll wrote: > > G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > >>> Currently, we accept all infected mail, and quietly quarantine it. > > > >> May I suggest that you quarantine it, BUT STILL REJECT IT after it > >> has been read (and recorde

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:24:29AM CEST, Henrik K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Who cares if it scans 100ms or 20ms. I prefer features and stability more > (which ClamAV might or might not have yet). Are you a talented coder or what > makes you think that such thing as "pseudo-binary" (I invented the

Re: [Clamav-users] Stop it!

Le Fri 3/10/2008, "Aécio F. Neto" disait > IMHO, this is one of the reasons free software doesn't go to the masses. > I have worked in both worlds - proprietary and free software - and this > last one lacks in many aspects that proprietary code takes care of: > being friendly. > There is a myth

Re: [Clamav-users] Why is ClamAV signature file so unpopular?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:12:11PM CET, Paul Kosinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > When I go to the download page for ClamAV at SourceForge, > I observe that the signature file ("clamav-0.*.*.tar.gz.sig") > is downloaded less than 10% of the time that the source code > ("clamav-0.*.*.tar.gz") is do

Re: [Clamav-users] Why is ClamAV signature file so unpopular?

On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:04:37AM CET, Dave Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > The only way a key can be completely trusted is if it's provided > completely independently of the download infrastructure, hosted > elsewhere entirely, requiring a compromise of two unique and unrelated > systems.

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson said: > Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > Try using for the URL. > > >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because > >> some of > >>> them may not kn

Re: [Clamav-users] Probelm with clamdscan in ClamAV 0.95

Le Sat 4/04/2009, s...@softhome.net disait > > Many thanks > I uninstalled ClamAV 0.95 and reinstalled it but no joy. > > clamd --version > ClamAV 0.95/9204/Sat Apr 4 02:22:15 2009 > > On starting clamd this is what I get: > ERROR: LOCAL: Socket file /tmp/clamd.socket is in use by another pr

Re: AW: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

Le Mon 20/09/2004, Steffen Heil disait > However, if you do such things, PLEASE only send a notification to the > intended user, NOT to the author. This would cause lot of collateral damage. And ONLY if the intended recipient is a local one... -- Erwan

Re: [Clamav-users] Milter

Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait > I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach? milter is the sendmail filtering interface. clamav-milter is the way to use clamav using this interface. -- Erwan David == Trus

Re: [Clamav-users] Milter

nd can be used or not indepently of clamav. -- Erwan David == Trusted Logic Tel: +33 1 30 97 25 03 5 rue du BailliageStd: +33 1 30 97 25 00 78000 Versailles Fax: +33 1 30 97 25

Re: [Clamav-users] Starting clamd in inittab

; a parent isn't supposed to die after spawning a child. Child > processes without parents are zombies. It is a standard way to daemonize a process. Child without parent are not zombies, they are "adopted" by init. Zombies are dead processes whose parent did not acknowledge t

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: Report infected mail to the user

y know an address that the virus presents as the sender address. And you trust the virus... -- Erwan David == Trusted Logic Tel: +33 1 30 97 25 03 5 rue du BailliageStd: +33 1 30 97 25 00

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: Report infected mail to the user

AL EXIST mail address? Too many for people who receive the kind of notification you want to send. -- Erwan David == Trusted Logic Tel: +33 1 30 97 25 03 5 rue du BailliageStd: +33 1 30 97 2

Re: [clamav-users] RClam AV installation with Postfix in RHEL

Le 18/05/2021 à 11:59, Eero Volotinen a écrit : Read the documentation http://books.msspace.net/mirrorbooks/linuxcookbook/0596006403/linuxckbk-CHP-21-SECT-8.html Typical way is use amavis with postfix