[Clamav-users] getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-19 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
I'll keep this short since I'm not sure that I have permission to post yet. I'm getting the digest, but being told my postings here are not allowed. According to what I understood from the various instructions and nag messages, I must subscribe first to the digest and that then allows me to post he

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-19 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Dennis Peterson wrote: > It might be that you still have an earlier version of clamscan on your > system and this can be found by running "which clamscan" if you're using > Linux or Unix. Thanks to all and you, Dennis in particular. Here are the results in Fedora Core kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-20 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
G.W., Hi, thanks for the insights: > [901 lines of garbage about top-posting trimmed - I'm on the digest.] Amen. I'm on the newsgroup (see below), but fwiw I LIKE top posting, I immediately know what is latest... But I digress ... The solution is to leave the digest and use the newsgroup, detail

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-20 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Jeff hi, thanks > Ged is correct. > > Type > > # which clamscan > > at your shell prompt and it will tell you where in your $PATH it is > finding the executable. This returns: [EMAIL PROTECTED] services]# which clamscan /usr/local/bin/clamscan So the installation is indeed th

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even

2005-12-20 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Dennis hi > The real point of education is that these duplicate files can and do exist > and that a good clean uninstall is needed for a good clean install. I agree. I'll report back tomorrow, but it looks like the old freshclam.log was generating the issue with clam-update. I've now nuked all o

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-20 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Fajar hi, thanks. > My guess is you have both /usr/bin/clamscan ( from RPM) and > /usr/local/bin/clamscan (from manual build). The same goes for libs also. . You are correct, thanks: /usr/bin/ contains May 18, 2005 versions of clamav-config clamdscan clamscan

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even

2005-12-21 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
C. Andrews Lavarre wrote: > I agree. I'll report back tomorrow, but it looks like the old > freshclam.log was generating the issue with clam-update. > > I've now nuked all older versions of freshclam and clamscan, cleaned > out the freshclam.log of older entries, still h

[Clamav-users] Re: getting nag screen about old installation even after installing 0.87.1

2005-12-21 Thread C. Andrews Lavarre
Bob Hutchinson wrote: > try > ps ax | grep freshclam Oooh. Very good: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.87.1]# ps ax | grep freshclam 5220 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/freshclam -d -p /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid > if it's there, try and figure out what is starting it (if you haven't