Hi,
whenever it is possible, I prefer to avoid using closed source and proprietary
software. For this reason, I'm looking for an open source and free (deep sense)
AV.
I read in your website and on the web that clamAV: includes a number of
utilities: a command-line scanner, automatic database upd
On 04/03/17 22:54, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
We cannot be tied to distribution support problems.
That's fine Joel. You obviously know your own target audience. If it's
not me I can look elsewhere for solutions :-)
On Mar 4, 2017, at 17:44, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Leonardo Rodrigues skrev
We make Immunet. It combines a cloud based detection engine with the offline
capability of clamav. It's extremely effective and free.
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 5, 2017, at 05:46, "erotavlas_tu...@libero.it"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> whenever it is possible, I prefer to avoid using closed
The question here is, do we strive to make a package that is installable on
more machines, (even ones that are going EOL?), or do we strive to make a
package that is the best for security?
If the package maintainers are doing a good job, ClamAV with a higher
dependency would install the higher
Em 04/03/17 22:03, Reindl Harald escreveu:
Am 04.03.2017 um 23:54 schrieb Joel Esler (jesler):
We cannot be tied to distribution support problems.
but when you think as long as every other software works on
RHEL/CentOS and only ClamAV decides to make hard requirements breaking
that from one
El 05/03/2017 a las 13:51, Joel Esler (jesler) escribió:
> The question here is, do we strive to make a package that is installable on
> more machines, (even ones that are going EOL?), or do we strive to make a
> package that is the best for security?
>
> If the package maintainers are doing a g
Am 05.03.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Carlos Velasco:
Another option would be to include a "static" internal version of pcre in
ClamAV. Although this option I like much less...
this is not a good option because you have easily multiple versions of
the pcre library in the same process when somethin
I had email domain issues which kept me from posting this the day of the
problem unfortunately so this info is just for future reference I guess.
If a problem like this comes up again, I found that you can create a
whitelist file to ignore some signatures.
I put the following file in the virus da
Thank you for your reply. I'm looking for and open source and free, in the
sense of freedom, AV.
However, since I have asked about AV for windows which is all except that free
and user privacy friendly, I can take a look at immunet.
Can you tell me if immunet uses ads, adware and something simila
I build Linux ClamAV from source, mainly due to distro maintainers
being (quite) behind the latest official ClamAV. Also, I build ClamAV
into /opt, so I can keep previous versions just in case.
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 12:51:04 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> The question here is, do we strive t
No ads, adware or anything.
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 5, 2017, at 11:01, "erotavlas_tu...@libero.it"
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply. I'm looking for and open source and free, in the
> sense of freedom, AV.
> However, since I have asked about AV for windows which is all except th
I thought there was a cmdline argument to on-demand clamscan to exec a
script after finishing. Am I imagining things or does this exist and if so
anyone know the flag & syntax?
Thx!
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://list
Hi there,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, Joel Esler wrote:
On Mar 5, 2017, at 05:46, Erotavlas_turbo wrote:
>
> whenever it is possible, I prefer to avoid using closed source and
> proprietary software... I would like to use it as standard AV for
> several cases including mail scanning, real-time file scan
Joel Esler (jesler) skrev den 2017-03-05 13:42:
We make Immunet. It combines a cloud based detection engine with the
offline capability of clamav. It's extremely effective and free.
windows only imho :(
would it be possible to see before clamavv 1.0 in linux ?
__
Adam Gibson skrev den 2017-03-05 16:29:
This whitelists those patterns so they do not even get processed to
cause
the crash in the regexp engine that clamd uses. Clamd started up fine
for
me with CentOS 5 after doing that.
did you test that this is same problem in centos 7 ?
come on :=)
y
On 3/5/2017 6:51 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
> The question here is, do we strive to make a package that is installable on
> more machines, (even ones that are going EOL?), or do we strive to make a
> package that is the best for security?
>
It's my understanding that the new features in pcr
I didn't see any problems on CentOS 7 or CentOS 6 on my systems using
clamav with the 23161 daily update. Are you saying you had a problem with
them? The only problem was with CentOS 5 on my systems. The workaround
would apply to any distribution though that was affected by the regexp not
workin
17 matches
Mail list logo
