> OpenSSL will be required to both compile and run ClamAV.
Out of interest what Cipher:
http://zombe.es/post/4078724716/openssl-cipher-selection
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/35036/different-performance-of-openssl-speed-on-the-same-hardware-with-aes-256-evp-an
Cheers,
Steve
San
On 02/27/14 02:34, Steve Basford wrote:
>
>
>> OpenSSL will be required to both compile and run ClamAV.
>
> Out of interest what Cipher:
>
> http://zombe.es/post/4078724716/openssl-cipher-selection
>
> http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/35036/different-performance-of-openssl-speed-o
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
>
>
> On 02/27/14 02:34, Steve Basford wrote:
> >
> >
> >> OpenSSL will be required to both compile and run ClamAV.
> >
> > Out of interest what Cipher:
> >
> > http://zombe.es/post/4078724716/openssl-cipher-selection
> >
> >
> http:
The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
That single reason is:
"We will be able to provide a better freshclam experience in a
future release."
What exactly does thi
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 18:43 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
> one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
> why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
>
> That single reason is:
>
> "We will be able to provide a bett
On 2/27/14, 3:43:08PM, Paul Kosinski wrote:
The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
That single reason is:
"We will be able to provide a better freshclam experience
