On 2/27/14, 3:43:08PM, Paul Kosinski wrote:
The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
That single reason is:
"We will be able to provide a better freshclam experience in a
future release."
What exactly does this mean? (The phrase "freshclam experience" is
marketing speak, not a technical explanation.)
Since adding complexity to a system tends to increase bugs and
decrease security, I am leery of seeing ClamAV become even more
complicated than it already has become.
Paul
I took it to mean there is a cloud on the horizon like they have for Snort.
http://www.snort.org/snort-rules/
Instead of Oinkcode you get gastrocode.
dp
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
